These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20021728)
1. Measuring and detecting associations: methods based on robust regression estimators or smoothers that allow curvature. Wilcox RR Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):379-93. PubMed ID: 20021728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment. Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data. Wei GC; Tanner MA Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1297-309. PubMed ID: 1786320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. Hewett P; Ganser GH Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local measures of association: estimating the derivative of the regression line. Wilcox RR Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17535582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies. Sidik K; Jonkman JN Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trading variance reduction with unbiasedness: the regularized subspace information criterion for robust model selection in kernel regression. Sugiyama M; Kawanabe M; Müller KR Neural Comput; 2004 May; 16(5):1077-104. PubMed ID: 15070511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias-corrected variance estimation and hypothesis testing for spatial point and marked point processes using subsampling. Guan Y Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):926-36. PubMed ID: 21133879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust ANCOVA using a smoother with bootstrap bagging. Wilcox RR Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):427-37. PubMed ID: 18652737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating and testing interactions in linear regression models when explanatory variables are subject to classical measurement error. Murad H; Freedman LS Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4293-310. PubMed ID: 17340676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust method for proportional hazards regression. Minder CE; Bednarski T Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):1033-47. PubMed ID: 8783440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of properties from simulations: a re-examination with modern statistical methods. Mansson RA; Frey JG; Essex JW; Welsh AH J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1791-803. PubMed ID: 16309286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data. Ghosh D Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 17651457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias reduction for risk ratio and vaccine effect estimators. Chick SE; Barth-Jones DC; Koopman JS Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1609-24. PubMed ID: 11391691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error. Fung KY; Krewski D J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear mixed models for replication data to efficiently allow for covariate measurement error. Bartlett JW; De Stavola BL; Frost C Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3158-78. PubMed ID: 19777493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression. Hertz-Picciotto I; Rockhill B Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1151-6. PubMed ID: 9333345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]