117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20022453)
21. Cemented hip revision surgery in severe acetabular defects using a semirigid acetabular reinforcement ring--a 5- to 25-year follow-up study.
Haverkamp D; De Man FH; Slegt R; Besselaar PP; Marti RK
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 18834699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. R3 Cup Does Not Have a High Failure Rate in Conventional Bearings: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up.
Teoh KH; Whitham RDJ; Golding DM; Wong JF; Lee PYF; Evans AR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):460-463. PubMed ID: 29107497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Failure of the polyethylene cups directly implanted into bone. A study of 32 Freeman cups after 9 years of followup (6-12 years)].
Boisgard S; Levai JP; Jaud E; Guyonnet G; Chatenet T
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Nov; 84(8):700-4. PubMed ID: 10192120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?
Brüggemann A; Fredlund E; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27892748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.
Davies JH; Laflamme GY; Delisle J; Fernandes J
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1245-50. PubMed ID: 21481564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings total hip replacement the right choice in patients younger than 50 years of age? A 7- to 15-year follow-up study.
Boyer P; Huten D; Loriaut P; Lestrat V; Jeanrot C; Massin P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Oct; 96(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 20620127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Hartofilakidis G; Georgiades G; Babis GC
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18534419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Poor results of the cementless total hip arthroplasty with a nonporous coated acetabular component: AcSys Shearer Cup.
Ikema M; Oyama M; Kita A; Funayama K
J Orthop Sci; 2007 Sep; 12(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 17909932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Hip revision arthroplasty in massive bone loss of acetabulum with the use of reinforcement ring].
Dorman T; Kmieć K; Pogonowicz E; Sibiński M; Synder M; Kozłowski P
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2011; 76(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 21850993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cementless metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age: a comparative study with twelve to fourteen-year follow-up.
Migaud H; Putman S; Krantz N; Vasseur L; Girard J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():137-42. PubMed ID: 21543703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Use of bulky, femoral head allografts in revision hip arthroplasty for acetabular component aseptic loosening].
Sibiński M; Dorman T; Drobniewski M; Synder M
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2010; 75(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 21648153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is cemented metal-polyethylene 22.2mm hip arthroplasty a gold standard? Results of a series of 105 primary arthroplasties at a minimum of ten years follow-up.
Mesnil P; Vasseur L; Wavreille G; Fontaine C; Duquennoy A; Migaud H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Jun; 100(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 24768433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One-year prospective comparative study of three large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip prostheses: serum metal ion levels and clinical outcomes.
Lardanchet JF; Taviaux J; Arnalsteen D; Gabrion A; Mertl P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 May; 98(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 22480865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cement-free revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum--intermediate term outcome with trabecular-oriented acetabulum implant].
Wirtz DC; Thielemann F; Holz U
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 9381766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The minimum 10-year results of a second-generation cementless acetabular shell with a polished inner surface.
Teo YS; Corten K; McCalden RW; Macdonald SJ; Bourne RB
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1370-5. PubMed ID: 22209041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
