128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20022598)
1. "Top hat" versus conventional loop electrosurgical excision procedure in women with a type 3 transformation zone.
Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Khunamornpong S; Sukpan K; Settakorn J; Srisomboon J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Apr; 109(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 20022598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical glandular involvement, multicentricity, and extent of the disease are features of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Güdücü N; Sidar G; Başsüllü N; Türkmen I; Dünder I
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 23665088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recurrent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Excision Procedure Versus Loop Procedure With Top Hat.
Francoeur AA; Furey KB; Ramirez J; Klomhaus AM; Holschneider C; Garcia LM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jul; 27(3):193-197. PubMed ID: 37285236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.
Cohen PA; Brand A; Sykes P; Wrede DCH; McNally O; Eva L; Rao A; Campion M; Stockler M; Powell A; Codde J; Bulsara MK; Anderson L; Leung Y; Farrell L; Stoyles P
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017576. PubMed ID: 28851799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.
Boonlikit S; Thitisagulwong S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 22710953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kwok ST; Chan KKL; Tse KY; Chu MMY; Lau LSK; Ngan HYS; Ngu SF
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 36720549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Two Step LEEP and Cold Conisation For Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions to Decrease Positive Surgical Margins.
Senol T; Polat M; Ozkaya E; Karateke A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3317-20. PubMed ID: 27509969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative predictors of positive margins after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure-Cone.
Tillmanns TD; Falkner CA; Engle DB; Wan JY; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin DS; Zuna R; Gold MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Feb; 100(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 16321430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
