These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Central capacity limits in consistent mapping, visual search tasks: four channels or more? Fisher DL Cogn Psychol; 1984 Oct; 16(4):449-84. PubMed ID: 6509895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Two metamodels of causal effects. Lund T Scand J Psychol; 1991; 32(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 1775948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A further evaluation of the limitation of wholistic visualization. Beech JR Acta Psychol (Amst); 1981 Nov; 49(2):95-108. PubMed ID: 7304252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Information input and response time. Hilgendorf L Ergonomics; 1966 Jan; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 5906120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Patient education strategies in dermatology: part 1: benefits and challenges. Zirwas MJ; Holder JL J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 2009 Dec; 2(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 20725581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Divided attention and the matching law: sample duration affects sensitivity to reinforcement allocation. Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 17918419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Divided attention performance and the matching law. Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA Learn Behav; 2006 Aug; 34(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 17089593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Hopkins WD; Washburn DA Anim Cogn; 2002 Mar; 5(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11957399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Attention in humans and animals: is there a capacity limitation at the time of encoding? Lamb MR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1991 Jan; 17(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 2002306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Element and compound matching-to-sample performance in pigeons: the roles of information load and training history. Brown MF; Morrison SK J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Apr; 16(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 2335772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Dissociation between features and feature relations in infant memory: effects of memory load. Bhatt RS; Rovee-Collier C J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):69-89. PubMed ID: 9344488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective. Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]