These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20023554)

  • 1. Point of care documentation impact on the nurse-patient interaction.
    Duffy WJ; Kharasch MS; Du H
    Nurs Adm Q; 2010; 34(1):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 20023554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic Documentation and Nurse-Patient Interaction.
    Gaudet CA
    ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2016; 39(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 26539694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical concerns in the use of electronic medical records.
    Phillips W; Fleming D
    Mo Med; 2009; 106(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 19902711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing patient safety through electronic medical record documentation of vital signs.
    Gearing P; Olney CM; Davis K; Lozano D; Smith LB; Friedman B
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(4):40-5. PubMed ID: 17091789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record.
    Green SD; Thomas JD
    Pediatr Nurs; 2008; 34(3):225-7, 240. PubMed ID: 18649812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction.
    Nahm R; Poston I
    Comput Nurs; 2000; 18(5):220-9. PubMed ID: 11016101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolution of nurse-to-nurse bedside report on a medical-surgical cardiology unit.
    Caruso EM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 17441625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-focused nursing documentation expressed by nurses.
    Laitinen H; Kaunonen M; Astedt-Kurki P
    J Clin Nurs; 2010 Feb; 19(3-4):489-97. PubMed ID: 20500288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Point-of-care documentation.
    Dignem L; McCarten J
    Can Nurse; 2002 Apr; 98(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 11989411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring provider adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines: a comparison of electronic medical record review, patient survey, and provider survey.
    Conroy MB; Majchrzak NE; Silverman CB; Chang Y; Regan S; Schneider LI; Rigotti NA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2005 Apr; 7 Suppl 1():S35-43. PubMed ID: 16036268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
    Likourezos A; Chalfin DB; Murphy DG; Sommer B; Darcy K; Davidson SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 15498630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Structured documentation of patients' medical records. A new record structure for emergency admissions is coming].
    Jensen BA; Rasmussen L; Qvist P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Aug; 167(32):2892-6. PubMed ID: 16109195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using electronic medical records to reduce errors and risks in a prenatal network.
    George J; Bernstein PS
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 21(6):527-31. PubMed ID: 19797949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the impact of an electronic medical record on nurse documentation time.
    Hakes B; Whittington J
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 18600132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bedside systems offer positive incentives.
    Randall A
    Healthc Inform; 1991 Aug; 8(8):26-8. PubMed ID: 10120851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Information technology and medical record routines in hospitals in the health care region 2].
    Jacobsen GM; Stangeland N; Velund TL; Blørstad O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Oct; 119(25):3765-8. PubMed ID: 10574055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nursing point of care documentation for the evaluation of human quality.
    Whittenburg L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():713-4. PubMed ID: 19592939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using technology to improve data capture and integration of patient-reported outcomes into clinical care: pilot results in a busy colorectal unit.
    Gurland B; Alves-Ferreira PC; Sobol T; Kiran RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1168-75. PubMed ID: 20628281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic medical record system in a headache specialty practice: a patient satisfaction survey.
    Freeman MC; Taylor AP; Adelman JU
    Headache; 2009 Feb; 49(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 18179567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.