These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Conference wet lab: is an IACUC needed? Response to protocol review scenario: a word from OLAW and USDA. Gipson C; Wigglesworth C Lab Anim (NY); 2006 Apr; 35(4):17. PubMed ID: 16582893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Conference wet lab: is an IACUC needed? Response to protocol review scenario: convene a committee. Goodman-Kuhel T Lab Anim (NY); 2006 Apr; 35(4):16. PubMed ID: 16582892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Conference wet lab: is an IACUC needed? Response to protocol review scenario: satellite situation. Funk AJ; Rogers T Lab Anim (NY); 2006 Apr; 35(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 16582891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost: benefit evaluations for research protocols. Response: IACUC or granting agency. Langan G; Theriault B Lab Anim (NY); 2010 May; 39(5):134. PubMed ID: 20410894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the IACUC interfering with study design? Freedom without accountability. Owiny JR Lab Anim (NY); 2005 Jun; 34(6):18-9. PubMed ID: 15924126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to protocol review scenario: category definitions are limited. Fyke H Lab Anim (NY); 2008 Mar; 37(3):106-7. PubMed ID: 18292768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New CEO, new IACUC? A word from OLAW and USDA. Brown P; Gipson C Lab Anim (NY); 2007 Feb; 36(2):16. PubMed ID: 17245380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost: benefit evaluations for research protocols. Response: Room for improvement. Struck MB; Andrutis KA Lab Anim (NY); 2010 May; 39(5):134-5. PubMed ID: 20410893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]