These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20024079)

  • 1. High-confidence mapping of chemical compounds and protein complexes reveals novel aspects of chemical stress response in yeast.
    Venancio TM; Balaji S; Aravind L
    Mol Biosyst; 2010 Jan; 6(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 20024079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness and evolvability in natural chemical resistance: identification of novel systems properties, biochemical mechanisms and regulatory interactions.
    Venancio TM; Balaji S; Geetha S; Aravind L
    Mol Biosyst; 2010 Aug; 6(8):1475-91. PubMed ID: 20517567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference of protein complex activities from chemical-genetic profile and its applications: predicting drug-target pathways.
    Han S; Kim D
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Aug; 4(8):e1000162. PubMed ID: 18769708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic approach to pair secretory cargo receptors with their cargo suggests a mechanism for cargo selection by Erv14.
    Herzig Y; Sharpe HJ; Elbaz Y; Munro S; Schuldiner M
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(5):e1001329. PubMed ID: 22629230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality.
    Hart GT; Lee I; Marcotte ER
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():236. PubMed ID: 17605818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational Analysis of the Chaperone Interaction Networks.
    Kumar A; Rizzolo K; Zilles S; Babu M; Houry WA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1709():275-291. PubMed ID: 29177666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MCL-CAw: a refinement of MCL for detecting yeast complexes from weighted PPI networks by incorporating core-attachment structure.
    Srihari S; Ning K; Leong HW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():504. PubMed ID: 20939868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A computationally guided protein-interaction screen uncovers coiled-coil interactions involved in vesicular trafficking.
    Zhang H; Chen J; Wang Y; Peng L; Dong X; Lu Y; Keating AE; Jiang T
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Sep; 392(1):228-41. PubMed ID: 19591838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Levy SF; Siegal ML
    PLoS Biol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):e264. PubMed ID: 18986213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-silico identification and characterization of organic and inorganic chemical stress responding genes in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
    Barozai MY; Bashir F; Muzaffar S; Afzal S; Behlil F; Khan M
    Gene; 2014 Oct; 550(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 25111117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bootstrapping the interactome: unsupervised identification of protein complexes in yeast.
    Friedel CC; Krumsiek J; Zimmer R
    J Comput Biol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 19630542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Yeast Three-Hybrid System for Protein Interactions.
    Glass F; Takenaka M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1794():195-205. PubMed ID: 29855958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorizing biases in high-confidence high-throughput protein-protein interaction data sets.
    Yu X; Ivanic J; Memisević V; Wallqvist A; Reifman J
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Dec; 10(12):M111.012500. PubMed ID: 21876202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All or nothing: protein complexes flip essentiality between distantly related eukaryotes.
    Ryan CJ; Krogan NJ; Cunningham P; Cagney G
    Genome Biol Evol; 2013; 5(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 23661563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PAIRing up cargo proteins.
    Choi CQ
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(5):e1001334. PubMed ID: 22629232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks.
    Nepusz T; Yu H; Paccanaro A
    Nat Methods; 2012 Mar; 9(5):471-2. PubMed ID: 22426491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural interpretation of protein-protein interaction network.
    Katebi AR; Kloczkowski A; Jernigan RL
    BMC Struct Biol; 2010 May; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 20487511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Yeast Golgi SNARE interactions are promiscuous.
    Tsui MM; Banfield DK
    J Cell Sci; 2000 Jan; 113 ( Pt 1)():145-52. PubMed ID: 10591633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiplex assay for condition-dependent changes in protein-protein interactions.
    Schlecht U; Miranda M; Suresh S; Davis RW; St Onge RP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jun; 109(23):9213-8. PubMed ID: 22615397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.