These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20025016)
1. CONSORTing with a QUOROM of MOOSES: the standards movement in scientific reporting. Lang T Neurourol Urodyn; 2010; 29(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 20025016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. To our contributors: trial registration. Druml W Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2006 Feb; 118(1-2):5-6. PubMed ID: 16489517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?]. Antes G; von Elm E Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Statement on matching language to the type of evidence used in describing outcomes data. Editors of the HEART Group journals Coron Artery Dis; 2013 May; 24(3):244. PubMed ID: 23377315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pragmatism, dynamism and flexibility in research and clinical practice. Acharya G Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 25761442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research reporting standards for endovascular treatment of pelvic venous insufficiency. Black CM; Thorpe K; Venrbux A; Kim HS; Millward SF; Clark TW; Kundu S; Martin LG; Sacks D; York J; Cardella JF J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):796-803. PubMed ID: 20494288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the evidence: is there a rigid hierarchy? Ho PM; Peterson PN; Masoudi FA Circulation; 2008 Oct; 118(16):1675-84. PubMed ID: 18852378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning from the past: refining the way we study treatments. Viechtbauer W J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):980-2. PubMed ID: 20573485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How evidence-based are publications in clinical ophthalmic journals? Lai TY; Leung GM; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1831-8. PubMed ID: 16638988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nullius in verba: don't take anyone's word for it. Lehman RS JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Jun; 173(12):1049-50. PubMed ID: 23609343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement! Heddle NM; Ness P Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Adherence to guidelines for improved quality of data reporting: where are we today? Elia N; Tramèr MR Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):478-80. PubMed ID: 21659804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting of the methodological quality and ethical aspects in clinical trials published in Indian journals: a survey. ; Kantharia ND; Yadav P; Deoghare S J Postgrad Med; 2011; 57(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 21206112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. eComment: Improving reporting quality in meta-analyses--endorsement of the QUOROM statement. Knobloch K; Yoon U Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Jun; 8(6):678. PubMed ID: 19443499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter. von Elm E Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The reading, writing, and arithmetic of the medical literature, part 3: critical appraisal of primary research. Mansfield L Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Jan; 96(1):7-15; quiz 15-6, 44. PubMed ID: 16440526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidenced based medicine. Benefits, limitations and issues for complementary and alternative medicine. Mendel J Aust J Holist Nurs; 2004 Oct; 11(2):21-9. PubMed ID: 19175254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]