189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20025028)
1. International Consultation on Urological Diseases: Evidence-based medicine overview of the main steps for developing and grading guideline recommendations.
Abrams P; Khoury S
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010; 29(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 20025028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How to use a clinical practice guideline.
Dahm P; Yeung LL; Gallucci M; Simone G; Schünemann HJ
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 19084846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critical analysis of the scientific evidence behind international guidelines related to cardiac arrhythmias.
Roos M; Brodbeck J; Sarkozy A; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Brugada P
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Apr; 4(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 21372270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. American Urological Association evidence-based guidelines: an important resource for urologic nurses.
Hubbard H; Kosiak B;
Urol Nurs; 2008 Oct; 28(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 18980107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Staying at the cutting edge: a review and analysis of evidence reporting and grading; the recommendations of the American Urological Association.
Faraday M; Hubbard H; Kosiak B; Dmochowski R
BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 19614654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for cardiac arrhythmias: practice makes progress.
Estes NA; Weinstock J
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Apr; 4(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 21505173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic reviews: grading recommendations and evidence quality.
Robinson JK; Dellavalle RP; Bigby M; Callen JP
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 18209174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation.
Aus G; Chapple C; Hanûs T; Irani J; Lobel B; Loch T; Mitropoulos D; Parsons K; Plass K; Schmid HP
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):859-64. PubMed ID: 18657895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial comment on: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation.
Galfano A
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):864. PubMed ID: 18657894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Acute backache guideline clearing process. Methodology and results of formal evaluation].
Thomeczek C; Lampert U; Brune K; Hasenbring M; Krämer J; Niebling W; Raspe H; Stäbler A; Steudel WI; Willburger RE; Zeilhofer HU; Kirchner H; Ollenschläger G;
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 12647734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines.
Wennekes L; Hermens RP; van Heumen K; Runde V; Schoelen H; Wollersheim HC; Grol RP; de Mulder PH; Ottevanger PB
Breast; 2008 Oct; 17(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 18455399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Developing guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of urologic diseases. German Society of Urology].
Urologe A; 1997 Sep; 36(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 9424801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence--based medicine overview of the main steps for developing and grading guideline recommendations.
Abrams P; Khoury S; Grant A
Prog Urol; 2007 May; 17(3):681-4. PubMed ID: 17622102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Transforming written guidelines into electronic formats--international perspectives.
Marshall C; Rosenbrand K; Ollenschlaeger G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():123-6. PubMed ID: 15537213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: Gunnar Aus, Christopher Chapple, Tomas Hanûs, et al. The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation. Eur Urol 2009;56:859-64.
Dahm P; Yeung L; Schünemann H
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):e21-2. PubMed ID: 19028007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Development of the evidence-based guidelines for psoriasis--a project of the German Dermatological Society (DDG)].
Follmann M; Sterry W; Rzany B; ;
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2005 Sep; 3(9):678-89. PubMed ID: 16173975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia].
Delessert D; Pomini V; Grasset F; Baumann P
Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 18514156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence.
Abrams P; Andersson KE; Birder L; Brubaker L; Cardozo L; Chapple C; Cottenden A; Davila W; de Ridder D; Dmochowski R; Drake M; Dubeau C; Fry C; Hanno P; Smith JH; Herschorn S; Hosker G; Kelleher C; Koelbl H; Khoury S; Madoff R; Milsom I; Moore K; Newman D; Nitti V; Norton C; Nygaard I; Payne C; Smith A; Staskin D; Tekgul S; Thuroff J; Tubaro A; Vodusek D; Wein A; Wyndaele JJ; ;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010; 29(1):213-40. PubMed ID: 20025020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Controversies in antimicrobial prophylaxis for urologic surgery: more up-to-date evidence is needed.
Yamamoto S; Shima H
Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):588-9. PubMed ID: 18852708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Levels of scientific evidence and grades of recommendations: methodological considerations].
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2000 Oct; 19(10):1023-7. PubMed ID: 11126105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
