These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20025374)

  • 21. Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample.
    Feldstein Ewing SW; LaChance HA; Bryan A; Hutchison KE
    Addict Biol; 2009 Jul; 14(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 19298319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a Brief Personalised Intervention for Alcohol Consumption in College Students.
    Clarke NC; Field M; Rose AK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131229. PubMed ID: 26098848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.
    Butler LH; Correia CJ
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2009 Mar; 23(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 19290702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Testing variability in response to a brief alcohol intervention: The role of self-regulation and the therapeutic relationship.
    Lopez-Vergara HI; Merrill JE; Carey KB
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2018 Mar; 32(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 29369672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention?
    Carey KB; Henson JM; Carey MP; Maisto SA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2007 Aug; 75(4):663-9. PubMed ID: 17663621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are there secondary effects on marijuana use from brief alcohol interventions for college students?
    White HR; Jiao Y; Ray AE; Huh D; Atkins DC; Larimer ME; Fromme K; Corbin WR; Baer JS; LaBrie JW; Mun EY
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2015 May; 76(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 25978822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Readiness to change and post-intervention drinking among Hispanic college students living on the US/Mexico border.
    Skewes MC; Dermen KH; Blume AW
    Addict Behav; 2011 Mar; 36(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 21109355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. PNF 2.0? Initial evidence that gamification can increase the efficacy of brief, web-based personalized normative feedback alcohol interventions.
    Boyle SC; Earle AM; LaBrie JW; Smith DJ
    Addict Behav; 2017 Apr; 67():8-17. PubMed ID: 27978426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Brief group alcohol interventions with college students: examining motivational components.
    McNally AM; Palfai TP
    J Drug Educ; 2003; 33(2):159-76. PubMed ID: 12929707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Collegiate heavy drinking prospectively predicts change in sensation seeking and impulsivity.
    Quinn PD; Stappenbeck CA; Fromme K
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2011 Aug; 120(3):543-56. PubMed ID: 21443288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peer enhancement of a brief motivational intervention with mandated college students.
    Tevyaw TO; Borsari B; Colby SM; Monti PM
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2007 Mar; 21(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 17385961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.
    Borsari B; Carey KB
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 16187809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reducing alcohol use in mandated college students: A comparison of a Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) and the Expectancy Challenge Alcohol Literacy Curriculum (ECALC).
    Dunn ME; Fried-Somerstein A; Flori JN; Hall TV; Dvorak RD
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020 Feb; 28(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 31008641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Brief web-based intervention for college students with comorbid risky alcohol use and depressed mood: does it work and for whom?
    Geisner IM; Varvil-Weld L; Mittmann AJ; Mallett K; Turrisi R
    Addict Behav; 2015 Mar; 42():36-43. PubMed ID: 25462652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of a stand-alone web-based electronic screening and brief intervention targeting alcohol use in university students of legal drinking age: A randomized controlled trial.
    Ganz T; Braun M; Laging M; Schermelleh-Engel K; Michalak J; Heidenreich T
    Addict Behav; 2018 Feb; 77():81-88. PubMed ID: 28985586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lack of effect for decisional balance as a brief motivational intervention for at-risk college drinkers.
    Collins SE; Carey KB
    Addict Behav; 2005 Aug; 30(7):1425-30. PubMed ID: 16022936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Defining and characterizing differences in college alcohol intervention efficacy: A growth mixture modeling application.
    Henson JM; Pearson MR; Carey KB
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2015 Apr; 83(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 25730522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.
    Borsari B; Carey KB
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2000 Aug; 68(4):728-33. PubMed ID: 10965648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does clinician continuity over two brief motivational sessions improve outcomes in college students?
    Short EE; Fernandez A; Borsari B; Hustad JT; Wood M
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2011 Oct; 41(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 21696911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.
    Barnett NP; Murphy JG; Colby SM; Monti PM
    Addict Behav; 2007 Nov; 32(11):2529-48. PubMed ID: 17707594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.