These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20025415)
1. Detecting threat-related intentional actions of others: effects of image quality, response mode, and target cuing on vigilance. Parasuraman R; de Visser E; Clarke E; McGarry WR; Hussey E; Shaw T; Thompson JC J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):275-90. PubMed ID: 20025415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing. Adam JJ; Koch I Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychophysiological investigation of vigilance decrement: boredom or cognitive fatigue? Pattyn N; Neyt X; Henderickx D; Soetens E Physiol Behav; 2008 Jan; 93(1-2):369-78. PubMed ID: 17999934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Wenke D; Fleming SM; Haggard P Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 19945697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality. van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The importance of object similarity in the production and identification of actions associated with objects. Desmarais G; Pensa MC; Dixon MJ; Roy EA J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Nov; 13(6):1021-34. PubMed ID: 17942020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task. Cant JS; Westwood DA; Valyear KF; Goodale MA Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 15707906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action. Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What activates the human mirror neuron system during observation of artificial movements: bottom-up visual features or top-down intentions? Engel A; Burke M; Fiehler K; Bien S; Rösler F Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2033-42. PubMed ID: 18339409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing a vigilance decrement in aged rats: effects of pre-feeding, task manipulation, and psychostimulants. Grottick AJ; Higgins GA Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 164(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 12373417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cue validity and object-based attention. He X; Fan S; Zhou K; Chen L J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1085-97. PubMed ID: 15298794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. Matthews G; Warm JS; Reinerman-Jones LE; Langheim LK; Washburn DA; Tripp L J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 20565203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition? Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of attending to multiple locations on eye movements. Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):1921-7. PubMed ID: 15820510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study. Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]