These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20025700)

  • 1. From defibrillation theory to clinical implications.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Jul; 33(7):814-25. PubMed ID: 20025700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The hyperbolic strength-duration relationship of defibrillation threshold.
    Irnich W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Aug; 55(8):2057-63. PubMed ID: 18632368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of ranolazine on ventricular vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in the intact porcine heart.
    Kumar K; Nearing BD; Bartoli CR; Kwaku KF; Belardinelli L; Verrier RL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1073-9. PubMed ID: 18479333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defibrillation threshold computed from normal and supernormal excitable cardiac tissue.
    Zhang H; Holden AV
    Math Biosci; 2004; 188():175-90. PubMed ID: 14766101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The shape of high-voltage impulse and the effect of defibrillation].
    Moroz VV; Bogushevich MS; Vostrikov VA; Kozlova EK; Chernysh AM
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2002; (6):60-3. PubMed ID: 12611162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of chronaxies for ventricular fibrillation induction, defibrillation, and cardiac stimulation: unexpected findings and their implications.
    Lawo T; Deneke T; Schrader J; Danilovic D; Wenzel B; Buddensiek M; Muegge A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 19175850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR
    Circulation; 1997 Nov; 96(10):3517-20. PubMed ID: 9396449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal truncation of defibrillation pulses.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Apr; 18(4 Pt 1):673-88. PubMed ID: 7596851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal truncation of defibrillation pulses.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):673-88. PubMed ID: 7659593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of different meshing algorithms in the computation of defibrillation thresholds in children.
    Stinstra JG; Jolley M; Callahan M; Weinstein D; Cole M; Brooks DH; Triedman J; MacLeod RS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1422-5. PubMed ID: 18002232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Optimization of the performance of electric defibrillation of the heart].
    Amosov GG; Fomichev DI
    Med Tekh; 1992; (4):7-9. PubMed ID: 1435152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Distribution of electric potentials in intra- and extracardiac defibrillation].
    Schmid C; Nitsch J; Funke HD; Kirchhoff PG
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 35(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 2444012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A realistic model for the analysis of heart magnetic stimulation.
    Pastore AP; De Leo A; De Leo R; Chiara GD; Primiani VM; Moglie F; Cerri G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 58(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 20699204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential pulse defibrillation for implantable defibrillators.
    Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Wessale JL; Kallok MJ; Graf JE; Geddes LA
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 3724587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions.
    Sepulveda NG; Wikswo JP; Echt DS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Apr; 37(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 2338348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tilt or pulse duration--which is the decisive parameter in defibrillation?
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Oct; 30(10):1181-2. PubMed ID: 17897119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A method of characteristic energy for comparative evaluation of monopolar defibrillation pulse efficiency].
    Gorbunov BB
    Med Tekh; 2009; (2):8-13. PubMed ID: 19437734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the optimal defibrillation waveform--how to reconcile theory and experiment?
    Krasteva VT; Kerkhof PL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1725-6; author reply 1726-7. PubMed ID: 16916112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.