BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20026482)

  • 1. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relative contribution of band number to phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2346-56. PubMed ID: 21848979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the relationship between sequence similarity and accurate phylogenetic trees.
    Cantarel BL; Morrison HG; Pearson W
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 16891377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting.
    Desper R; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Mar; 21(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 14694080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A penalty of using anonymous dominant markers (AFLPs, ISSRs, and RAPDs) for phylogenetic inference.
    Simmons MP; Zhang LB; Webb CT; Müller K
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):528-42. PubMed ID: 16997581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian dating of shallow phylogenies with a relaxed clock.
    Brown RP; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2010 Mar; 59(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 20525625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method.
    Tamura K; Nei M; Kumar S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Jul; 101(30):11030-5. PubMed ID: 15258291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AFLPMax: a user-friendly application for computing the optimal number of amplified fragment length polymorphism markers needed in phylogenetic reconstruction.
    García-Pereira MJ; Quesada H; Caballero A; Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 May; 12(3):566-9. PubMed ID: 22268698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of protein distance measures and tree-building methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Hollich V; Milchert L; Arvestad L; Sonnhammer EL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2257-64. PubMed ID: 16049194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mtdna and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks (Nomonyx-Oxyura)?
    McCracken K; Sorenson M
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 15805009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.
    Qiao B; Goldberg TL; Olsen GJ; Weigel RM
    Infect Genet Evol; 2006 Jul; 6(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 16406823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree.
    Gadagkar SR; Rosenberg MS; Kumar S
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2005 Jan; 304(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 15593277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trees of trees: an approach to comparing multiple alternative phylogenies.
    Nye TM
    Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 18853364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the inference of large phylogenies with long branches: how long is too long?
    Mossel E; Roch S; Sly A
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Jul; 73(7):1627-44. PubMed ID: 20931293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of phylogenetic relationships of grain amaranths and their wild relatives (Amaranthus; Amaranthaceae) using internal transcribed spacer, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and double-primer fluorescent intersimple sequence repeat markers.
    Xu F; Sun M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2001 Dec; 21(3):372-87. PubMed ID: 11741380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multi-neighbor-joining approach for phylogenetic tree reconstruction and visualization.
    Silva AE; Villanueva WJ; Knidel H; Bonato VC; Reis SF; Von Zuben FJ
    Genet Mol Res; 2005 Sep; 4(3):525-34. PubMed ID: 16342037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
    Liu L; Pearl DK
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):504-14. PubMed ID: 17562474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference.
    Ogden TH; Rosenberg MS
    Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 16611602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.