These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize. Berg JM Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18276870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century. Baldwin W; McCardle P Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize. Response. Capecchi MR Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18283726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies. Zerhouni EA Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients. Dove A Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions. Wadman M Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6654):898. PubMed ID: 9353109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Revitalizing the federal commitment in support of biomedical research. Hathaway DR Clin Res; 1988 Sep; 36(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 3168401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'. Kaiser J Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise. Wyngaarden JB P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Grant applications swamp agency. Wadman M Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7248):763. PubMed ID: 19516308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A curbstone consult to applicants for National Institute of Mental Health grant support. Rush AJ; Gullion CM; Prien RF Psychopharmacol Bull; 1996; 32(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 8961773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biologists wary that cash up front could mean cuts later. Check E Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):677. PubMed ID: 12610581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux. Munger K Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]