These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20026793)

  • 21. The NIH and numbers: a vital concern's concern.
    Healy B; Keyworth GA
    N Engl J Med; 1985 May; 312(22):1450-2. PubMed ID: 3990746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An assessment of NHLBI requests for applications.
    Roth CA
    Physiologist; 1987 Jun; 30(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 3602117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1169. PubMed ID: 18309051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Grant review: American Idol or big brother?
    Dinov ID
    Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):663-4; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Varmus speaks out on need to boost clinical research.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):118. PubMed ID: 7969431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomedical politics. Sex studies 'properly' approved.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):741. PubMed ID: 14764836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In defence of small science.
    Sachs F
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6656):203. PubMed ID: 9367161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect on physician-scientists of the low funding rate of NIH grant applications.
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Nov; 323(18):1283-4. PubMed ID: 2215613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NIH baffled by drop in applications.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6485):87. PubMed ID: 8022489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MRC commitments.
    Harvey SC
    Science; 1998 Feb; 279(5353):967-8. PubMed ID: 9490479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.