These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2002682)
1. Microvascular pedal bypass for salvage of the severely ischemic limb. Gloviczki P; Morris SM; Bower TC; Toomey BJ; Naessens JM; Stanson AW Mayo Clin Proc; 1991 Mar; 66(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 2002682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microscope-aided pedal bypass is an effective and low-risk operation to salvage the ischemic foot. Gloviczki P; Bower TC; Toomey BJ; Mendonca C; Naessens JM; Schabauer AM; Stanson AW; Rooke TW Am J Surg; 1994 Aug; 168(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 8053532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pedal bypass versus tibial bypass with autogenous vein: a comparison of outcome and hemodynamic results. Schneider JR; Walsh DB; McDaniel MD; Zwolak RM; Besso SR; Cronenwett JL J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jun; 17(6):1029-38; discussion 1038-40. PubMed ID: 8505781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Arterial reconstruction of vessels in the foot and ankle. Davidson JT; Callis JT Ann Surg; 1993 Jun; 217(6):699-708; discussion 708-10. PubMed ID: 8507116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Very distal bypass for salvage of the severely ischemic extremity. QuiƱones-Baldrich WJ; Colburn MD; Ahn SS; Gelabert HA; Moore WS Am J Surg; 1993 Aug; 166(2):117-23; discussion 123. PubMed ID: 8352401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The benefits of secondary interventions in patients with failing or failed pedal bypass grafts. Rhodes JM; Gloviczki P; Bower TC; Panneton JM; Canton LG; Toomey BJ Am J Surg; 1999 Aug; 178(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 10487269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early experience with cryopreserved saphenous vein allografts as a conduit for complex limb-salvage procedures. Walker PJ; Mitchell RS; McFadden PM; James DR; Mehigan JT J Vasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 18(4):561-8; discussion 568-9. PubMed ID: 8411463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preferred strategies for secondary infrainguinal bypass: lessons learned from 300 consecutive reoperations. Belkin M; Conte MS; Donaldson MC; Mannick JA; Whittemore AD J Vasc Surg; 1995 Feb; 21(2):282-93; discussion 293-5. PubMed ID: 7853601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedal or peroneal bypass: which is better when both are patent? Bergamini TM; George SM; Massey HT; Henke PK; Klamer TW; Lambert GE; Banis JC; Miller FB; Garrison RN; Richardson JD J Vasc Surg; 1994 Sep; 20(3):347-55; discussion 355-6. PubMed ID: 8084026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1000 cases. Pomposelli FB; Kansal N; Hamdan AD; Belfield A; Sheahan M; Campbell DR; Skillman JJ; Logerfo FW J Vasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 37(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 12563200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors determining the outcome of crural and pedal revascularisation for critical limb ischaemia. Tordoir JH; van der Plas JP; Jacobs MJ; Kitslaar PJ Eur J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 7(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 8454085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Redo pedal bypass surgery after pedal graft failure: gain or gadget? Domenig CM; Aspalter M; Umathum M; Holzenbein TJ Ann Vasc Surg; 2007 Nov; 21(6):713-8. PubMed ID: 17923383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]