170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20027432)
1. Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with Protaper Universal rotary system.
Aguiar CM; Mendes Dde A; Câmara AC; Figueiredo AP
J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 20027432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the centreing ability of the ProTaper Universal rotary system in curved roots in comparison to Nitiflex files.
Aguiar CM; de Andrade Mendes D; Câmara AC; de Figueiredo JA
Aust Endod J; 2009 Dec; 35(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 19961458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the centring ability of the ProTaper™ and ProTaper Universal™ rotary systems for preparing curved root canals.
Aguiar CM; Sobrinho PB; Teles F; Câmara AC; de Figueiredo JA
Aust Endod J; 2013 Apr; 39(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 23551510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ex vivo analysis of the debris remaining in flattened root canals of vital and nonvital teeth after biomechanical preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
Sasaki EW; Versiani MA; Perez DE; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva-Sousa YT; Silva RG
Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 17262131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT evaluation of apical canal transportation associated with stainless steel hand files, oscillatory technique and pro taper rotary system.
Hartmann MS; Fontanella VR; Vanni JR; Fornari VJ; Barletta FB
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 21861027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of a self-adjusting file to remove residual gutta-percha after retreatment with rotary files.
Abramovitz I; Relles-Bonar S; Baransi B; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 Apr; 45(4):386-92. PubMed ID: 22283664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals.
Marfisi K; Mercade M; Plotino G; Duran-Sindreu F; Bueno R; Roig M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1022-8. PubMed ID: 20726911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study.
Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography.
Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.
Schmitz Mda S; Santos R; Capelli A; Jacobovitz M; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 18949299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
