These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20028193)

  • 1. Usefulness of remote monitoring in cardiac implantable device follow-up.
    Stoepel C; Boland J; Busca R; Saal G; Oliveira M
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Dec; 15(10):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20028193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Remote monitoring for follow-up of patients with implantable cardiac devices].
    Oliveira M; Silva Cunha P; da Silva N
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 32(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 23415739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator.
    Heidbüchel H; Lioen P; Foulon S; Huybrechts W; Ector J; Willems R; Ector H
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18245771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic analysis of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Results of the Health Economics Evaluation Registry for Remote Follow-up (TARIFF) study.
    Ricci RP; Vicentini A; D'Onofrio A; Sagone A; Rovaris G; Padeletti L; Morichelli L; Fusco A; De Vivo S; Lombardi L; Denaro A; Pollastrelli A; Colangelo I; Santini M
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Jan; 14(1):50-57. PubMed ID: 27614025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus quarterly device interrogations in clinic: results from a randomized pilot clinical trial.
    Al-Khatib SM; Piccini JP; Knight D; Stewart M; Clapp-Channing N; Sanders GD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 21(5):545-50. PubMed ID: 20021522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remote monitoring of patients with implanted devices: data exchange and integration.
    Van der Velde ET; Atsma DE; Foeken H; Witteman TA; Hoekstra WH
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 20(2 Suppl):8-12. PubMed ID: 23702984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Remote versus face-to-face monitoring for implantable cardiac devices: rationale and design of the PORTLink (PORTuguese Research on Telemonitoring with CareLink) trial].
    Oliveira M; Fernandes M; Primo J; Reis H; Nicola P;
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 32(12):957-64. PubMed ID: 24280079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis.
    Cronin EM; Ching EA; Varma N; Martin DO; Wilkoff BL; Lindsay BD
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Dec; 9(12):1947-51. PubMed ID: 22864266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Work burden with remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator: is it time for reimbursement policies?
    Papavasileiou LP; Forleo GB; Panattoni G; Schirripa V; Minni V; Magliano G; Bellos K; Santini L; Romeo F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2013 Feb; 14(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 22644407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review on remote monitoring technology applied to implantable electronic cardiovascular devices.
    Costa PD; Rodrigues PP; Reis AH; Costa-Pereira A
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Dec; 16(10):1042-50. PubMed ID: 21070132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-utility analysis of the EVOLVO study on remote monitoring for heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: randomized controlled trial.
    Zanaboni P; Landolina M; Marzegalli M; Lunati M; Perego GB; Guenzati G; Curnis A; Valsecchi S; Borghetti F; Borghi G; Masella C
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 May; 15(5):e106. PubMed ID: 23722666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.
    Varma N
    Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 18035071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the use of remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic device follow-up.
    Yee R; Verma A; Beardsall M; Fraser J; Philippon F; Exner DV
    Can J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 29(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 23465345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential role of telemedical service centers in managing remote monitoring data transmitted daily by cardiac implantable electronic devices: results of the early detection of cardiovascular events in device patients with heart failure (detecT-Pilot) study.
    Müller A; Goette A; Perings C; Nägele H; Konorza T; Spitzer W; Schulz SS; von Bary C; Hoffmann M; Albani M; Sack S; Niederlöhner A; Lewalter T
    Telemed J E Health; 2013 Jun; 19(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 23570275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial.
    Varma N; Epstein AE; Irimpen A; Schweikert R; Love C;
    Circulation; 2010 Jul; 122(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 20625110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices: health technology assessment ].
    Ricci RP; Locati ET; Campana A; Cavallaro C; Giammaria M; Landolina M; Marzegalli M; Melissano D
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2015 May; 16(5):295-303. PubMed ID: 25994466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and economic impact of remote monitoring on the follow-up of patients with implantable electronic cardiovascular devices: an observational study.
    Costa PD; Reis AH; Rodrigues PP
    Telemed J E Health; 2013 Feb; 19(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 23336734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remote Active Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure (RAPID-RF): design and rationale.
    Saxon LA; Boehmer JP; Neuman S; Mullin CM
    J Card Fail; 2007 May; 13(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 17517341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective analysis.
    Schoenfeld MH; Compton SJ; Mead RH; Weiss DN; Sherfesee L; Englund J; Mongeon LR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):757-63. PubMed ID: 15189530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up.
    Raatikainen MJ; Uusimaa P; van Ginneken MM; Janssen JP; Linnaluoto M
    Europace; 2008 Oct; 10(10):1145-51. PubMed ID: 18703585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.