81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20029899)
1. Interval estimation of the effective population size from heterozygote-excess in SNP markers.
Nomura T
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):996-1016. PubMed ID: 20029899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative performance of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for population genetic analysis.
Coates BS; Sumerford DV; Miller NJ; Kim KS; Sappington TW; Siegfried BD; Lewis LC
J Hered; 2009; 100(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 19525239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parallel optimization and genotyping of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphism markers by sample pooling approach using cycling-gradient CE with multiple injections.
Minarik M; Benesova L; Fantova L; Horacek J; Heracek J; Loukola A
Electrophoresis; 2006 Oct; 27(19):3856-63. PubMed ID: 16972303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primer design and marker clustering for multiplex SNP-IT primer extension genotyping assay using statistical modeling.
Yuryev A; Huang J; Scott KE; Kuebler J; Donaldson M; Phillips MS; Pohl M; Boyce-Jacino MT
Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3526-32. PubMed ID: 15284101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microsatellites versus Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in confidence interval estimation of disease loci.
Papachristou C; Lin S
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 16355404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel statistical method to estimate the effective SNP size in vertebrate genomes and categorized genomic regions.
Seo D; Jiang C; Zhao Z
BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():329. PubMed ID: 17196097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A standard protocol for single nucleotide primer extension in the human genome using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
Wise CA; Paris M; Morar B; Wang W; Kalaydjieva L; Bittles AH
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2003; 17(11):1195-202. PubMed ID: 12772276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of a genetic contamination in a commercial mouse strain using two panels of polymorphic markers.
Nitzki F; Kruger A; Reifenberg K; Wojnowski L; Hahn H
Lab Anim; 2007 Apr; 41(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 17430621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A semi-automated system for analysis and storage of SNPs.
Lehnert V; Holzwarth J; Ott M; Thompson A; Demmak S; Foernzler D
Hum Mutat; 2001 Apr; 17(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 11295821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of biallelic markers and microsatellites for the estimation of population and conservation genetic parameters in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
Ryynänen HJ; Tonteri A; Vasemägi A; Primmer CR
J Hered; 2007; 98(7):692-704. PubMed ID: 17986472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SNP genotyping with fluorescence polarization detection.
Kwok PY
Hum Mutat; 2002 Apr; 19(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 11933186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
Cheng Y; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of genome-wide haplotype effects in half-sib designs.
Kolbehdari D; Schaeffer LR; Robinson JA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 18076472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [CSNP discovery by two-dimensional gene scanning (TDGS)].
Suh Y
Exp Mol Med; 2001 Apr; 33(1 Suppl):21-47. PubMed ID: 11708324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CHOISS for selection of single nucleotide polymorphism markers on interval regularity.
Lee S; Kang C
Bioinformatics; 2004 Mar; 20(4):581-2. PubMed ID: 14764562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a SNP genotyping panel for genetic monitoring of the laboratory mouse.
Petkov PM; Cassell MA; Sargent EE; Donnelly CJ; Robinson P; Crew V; Asquith S; Haar RV; Wiles MV
Genomics; 2004 May; 83(5):902-11. PubMed ID: 15081119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [How about the uncertainty in the haplotypes in the population-based KORA studies?].
Heid IM; Lamina C; Bongardt F; Fischer G; Klopp N; Huth C; Küchenhoff H; Kronenberg F; Wichmann HE; Illig T
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Aug; 67 Suppl 1():S132-6. PubMed ID: 16032531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?
Waples RS
Mol Ecol; 2005 Oct; 14(11):3335-52. PubMed ID: 16156807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating relative population sizes from simulated data sets and the question of greater African effective size.
Eller E
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Sep; 116(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11536112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
