These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2003022)

  • 1. A technique for evaluating bony changes in the anterior edentulous maxilla: a modification of a cephalometric analysis.
    Scott RF; Barber HD; Maxson BB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Feb; 71(2):250-1. PubMed ID: 2003022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Sağlam AA
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 12073724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative estimation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular jawbones in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Panchbhai AS
    Spec Care Dentist; 2013; 33(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 23451926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jaw morphology in edentulous individuals: a radiographic cephalometric study.
    Engström C; Hollender L; Lindqvist S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1985 Nov; 12(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3864962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Panoramic and tomographic dimensional determinations for maxillary osseointegrated implants. Comparison of the morphologic information potential of two and three dimensional radiographic systems.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 7597633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning.
    Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between subsinus bone height and bone volume requirements for dental implants: a human radiographic study.
    Kopecka D; Simunek A; Brazda T; Rota M; Slezak R; Capek L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22299078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of facial and lingual cortical thicknesses in edentulous maxillary and mandibular sites measured on computerized tomograms.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):256-8. PubMed ID: 19170291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts--a 3-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
    Fermergård R; Åstrand P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 19906268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cephalometric tomographic technique to visualize the buccolingual and vertical dimensions of the mandible.
    Fernandes RJ; Azarbal M; Ismail YH; Curtin HD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Oct; 58(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 3478479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants.
    Bergkvist G; Sahlholm S; Nilner K; Lindh C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15142099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla.
    Jemt T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 18950060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral cephalometric radiograph for the planning of maxillary implant reconstruction.
    Beltrão GC; de Abreu AT; Beltrão RG; Finco NF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 17329588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in Bone Levels Around Mini-Implants in Edentulous Arches.
    Mundt T; Schwahn C; Biffar R; Heinemann F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1149-55. PubMed ID: 26394353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective analysis of bar-retained dentures with cantilever extension: marginal bone level changes around dental implants over time.
    Semper W; Heberer S; Nelson K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 20369100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthognathic and osteoperiosteal flap augmentation strategies for maxillary dental implant reconstruction.
    Jensen OT; Ringeman JL; Cottam JR; Casap N
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 May; 23(2):301-19, vi. PubMed ID: 21492803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.