223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20030674)
1. Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth under local anesthesia of the natural antagonistic teeth.
Enkling N; Heussner S; Nicolay C; Bayer S; Mericske-Stern R; Utz KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 20030674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth.
Enkling N; Nicolay C; Utz KH; Jöhren P; Wahl G; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 17348888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants versus natural dentition: a split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Kazemi M; Geramipanah F; Negahdari R; Rakhshan V
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 23490397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Osseoperception: active tactile sensibility of osseointegrated dental implants.
Enkling N; Utz KH; Bayer S; Stern RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 21197493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.
Mericske-Stern R; Assal P; Mericske E; Bürgin W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 7615331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tactile sensibility of sapphire endosseous dental implants.
Yamauchi M; Amano N
Oral Health; 1992 Mar; 82(3):23-4, 26, 28, passim. PubMed ID: 1291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses.
Batista M; Bonachela W; Soares J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 18422982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral tactile sensibility recorded in overdenture wearers with implants or natural roots: a comparative study. Part 2.
Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 8150514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating interocclusal perception in tactile teeth sensibility using symmetric and asymmetric analysis.
Enkling N; Nicolay C; Bayer S; Mericske-Stern R; Utz KH
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 19816719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Preliminary study on tactile function of implant-supported single crowns].
Li N; Xie QF; Lin Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):458-61. PubMed ID: 24238409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Passive tactile sensibility of teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla.
Grieznis L; Apse P; Blumfelds L
Stomatologija; 2010; 12(3):80-6. PubMed ID: 21063137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL versus 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar.
Martin M; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):588-92. PubMed ID: 21496653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do sensation differences exist between dental implants and natural teeth?: a meta-analysis.
Higaki N; Goto T; Ishida Y; Watanabe M; Tomotake Y; Ichikawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1307-1310. PubMed ID: 25279692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Active Tactile Sensibility in Implant Prosthesis vs. Complete Dentures: A Psychophysical Study.
González-Gil D; Dib-Zaitun I; Flores-Fraile J; López-Marcos J
J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Buccal versus lingual articaine infiltration for mandibular tooth anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Meechan JG; Jaber AA; Corbett IP; Whitworth JM
Int Endod J; 2011 Jul; 44(7):676-81. PubMed ID: 21447137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active tactile sensibility of three-unit implant-supported FPDs versus natural dentition.
Negahdari R; Ghavimi M; Ghanizadeh M; Bohlouli S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Jul; 11(7):e636-e641. PubMed ID: 31516662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for combination labial plus lingual infiltrations versus labial infiltration in the mandibular lateral incisor.
Nuzum FM; Drum M; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):952-6. PubMed ID: 20478446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of Osseoperception and Tactile Sensibility during Masticatory Function in Different Prosthetic Rehabilitations: A Review.
González-Gil D; Dib-Zaitum I; Flores-Fraile J; López-Marcos J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jan; 58(1):. PubMed ID: 35056400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of active tactile sensibility in a single-tooth implant opposing a natural tooth with either an immediate or delayed functional loading protocol: A parallel design clinical study.
Deepika K; Bhatnagar A; Singh A; Soni R
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36621356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
