223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20030674)
21. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tactile Sensibility Thresholds in Implant Prosthesis, Complete Dentures and Natural Dentition: Review about Their Value in Literature.
González-Gil D; Flores-Fraile J; López-Marcos J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 35454340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration in the mandibular first molar.
McEntire M; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 21419288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Poorni S; Veniashok B; Senthilkumar AD; Indira R; Ramachandran S
J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1603-7. PubMed ID: 22099890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.
Batista da Silva C; Berto LA; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Motta RH; Ranali J; Groppo FC
J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):438-41. PubMed ID: 20171359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.
Rosenberg PA; Amin KG; Zibari Y; Lin LM
J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 17368327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Single-tooth implants and their role in preserving remaining teeth: a 10-year survival study.
Priest G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 10212534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic versus asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Argueta-Figueroa L; Arzate-Sosa G; Mendieta-Zeron H
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):e39-43. PubMed ID: 22313992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative evaluation of the oral tactile function by means of teeth or implant-supported prostheses.
Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 1809402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Thresholds for tactile sensitivity perceived with dental implants remain unchanged during a healing phase of 3 months.
Keller D; Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Mar; 7(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 9002822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is it possible to anesthetize palatal tissues with buccal 4% articaine injection?
Ozeç I; Taşdemir U; Gümüş C; Solak O
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1032-7. PubMed ID: 20223573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth.
Hämmerle CH; Wagner D; Brägger U; Lussi A; Karayiannis A; Joss A; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Jun; 6(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7578785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Articaine for supplemental intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Bigby J; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Weaver J
J Endod; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1044-7. PubMed ID: 17055903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Osseoperception in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.
Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Chrcanovic BR; Brånemark PI
J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 26823228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Changes in passive tactile sensibility associated with dental implants following their placement.
El-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA; Howell PG; Gilthorpe MS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 12705306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars.
Corbett IP; Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18436027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
