295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20030886)
1. The HTA core model: a novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments.
Lampe K; Mäkelä M; Garrido MV; Anttila H; Autti-Rämö I; Hicks NJ; Hofmann B; Koivisto J; Kunz R; Kärki P; Malmivaara A; Meiesaar K; Reiman-Möttönen P; Norderhaug I; Pasternack I; Ruano-Ravina A; Räsänen P; Saalasti-Koskinen U; Saarni SI; Walin L; Kristensen FB;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():9-20. PubMed ID: 20030886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Testing the HTA core model: experiences from two pilot projects.
Pasternack I; Anttila H; Mäkelä M; Ikonen T; Räsänen P; Lampe K; van Brabandt H; Cleemput I; de Laet C; Marchetti M; Refolo P; Sacchini D; Kunz R; Nordmann A; Lühmann D; Freyschuss B;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():21-7. PubMed ID: 20030887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The feasibility of harmonizing health technology assessments across jurisdictions: a case study of drug eluting stents.
Trueman P; Hurry M; Bending M; Hutton J
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 19845975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?
Tarride JE; McCarron CE; Lim M; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Hopkins R; O'Reilly D; Xie F; Goeree R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 18828938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time-trends in health technology assessments: an analysis of developments in composition of international health technology assessments from 1989 to 2002.
Draborg E; Gyrd-Hansen D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 16262973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments.
Hailey D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):415-8. PubMed ID: 19619362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing the HTA core model for the online environment.
Lampe K; Pasternack I; Saarekas O; Raustia L; Cleemput I; Corio M; Endel G; Frønsdal K; Imaz I; Kleijnen S; Kristensen F; Rüther A; Werkö S; Cerbo M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Nov; 30(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 25747556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the quality of mini-HTA.
Kidholm K; Ehlers L; Korsbek L; Kjaerby R; Beck M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jan; 25(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19126250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the hta core model with a national health technology assessment report.
Pasternack I; de Groot I; Kleijnen S; Polman P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Nov; 30(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 25747563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recommendations in health technology assessments worldwide.
Draborg E; Andersen CK
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16571190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.
Drummond MF; Schwartz JS; Jönsson B; Luce BR; Neumann PJ; Siebert U; Sullivan SD
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. PubMed ID: 18601792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward a new information infrastructure in health technology assessment: communication, design, process, and results.
Neikter SA; Rehnqvist N; Rosén M; Dahlgren H
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():92-8. PubMed ID: 20030896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies.
Drummond M; Manca A; Sculpher M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 15921055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs: state of the art.
Lee A; Skött LS; Hansen HP
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):530-6. PubMed ID: 19845983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. History of health technology assessment in Belgium.
Cleemput I; Van Wilder P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():82-7. PubMed ID: 19500438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Web-based toolkit to facilitate European collaboration on evidence generation on promising health technologies.
Quentin F; Carbonneil C; Moty-Monnereau C; Berti E; Goettsch W; Lee-Robin SH;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():68-74. PubMed ID: 20030893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [HTA goes Europe: European collaboration on joint assessment and methodological issues becomes reality].
Nachtnebel A; Mayer J; Erdös J; Lampe K; Kleijnen S; Schnell-Inderst P; Wild C
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):291-9. PubMed ID: 26354129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of health technology assessment in shaping the benefits package in The Netherlands.
Stolk EA; de Bont A; van Halteren AR; Bijlmer RJ; Poley MJ
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Feb; 9(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19371181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surrogate outcomes in health technology assessment: an international comparison.
Velasco Garrido M; Mangiapane S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 19619350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
