These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20030965)

  • 1. Estimation of a four-parameter item response theory model.
    Loken E; Rulison KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):509-25. PubMed ID: 20030965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian analysis of mixtures in structural equation models with non-ignorable missing data.
    Cai JH; Song XY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):491-508. PubMed ID: 20030969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian Modal Estimation of the Four-Parameter Item Response Model in Real, Realistic, and Idealized Data Sets.
    Waller NG; Feuerstahler L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 28306347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the polychoric correlation from misclassified data.
    Yiu CF; Poon WY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):49-74. PubMed ID: 18482475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the regression slopes of independent groups.
    Ng M; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):319-40. PubMed ID: 19807946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An eigenvector method for estimating item parameters of the dichotomous and polytomous Rasch models.
    Garner M
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 12011497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Separating response-execution bias from decision bias: arguments for an additional parameter in Ratcliff's diffusion model.
    Voss A; Voss J; Klauer KC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):539-55. PubMed ID: 20030967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Omnibus hypothesis testing in dominance-based ordinal multiple regression.
    Long JD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):329-51. PubMed ID: 16221032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision of the ICIDH Severity of Disabilities Scale by data linking and item response theory.
    van Buuren S; Hopman-Rock M
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1061-76. PubMed ID: 11276036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
    Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling to item-response theory modeling of multi-symptom genetic data.
    Eaves L; Erkanli A; Silberg J; Angold A; Maes HH; Foley D
    Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):765-80. PubMed ID: 16273316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parameter recovery for the rating scale model using PARSCALE.
    French GA; Dodd BG
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(2):176-99. PubMed ID: 10204326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling non-ignorable missing-data mechanisms with item response theory models.
    Holman R; Glas CA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):1-17. PubMed ID: 15969835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New methods for new questions: obstacles and opportunities.
    Foster EM; Kalil A
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Mar; 44(2):301-4. PubMed ID: 18331123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing multivariate mean collinearity via latent variable modelling.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):481-90. PubMed ID: 19840492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A graded response model for measuring person reliability.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):641-62. PubMed ID: 19159504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical significance values for linkage analysis: trait simulation using posterior model distributions from MCMC oligogenic segregation analysis.
    Igo RP; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 17849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.