219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20030968)
1. Detecting a lack of association: an equivalence testing approach.
Goertzen JR; Cribbie RA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):527-37. PubMed ID: 20030968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian analysis of mixtures in structural equation models with non-ignorable missing data.
Cai JH; Song XY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):491-508. PubMed ID: 20030969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the regression slopes of independent groups.
Ng M; Wilcox RR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):319-40. PubMed ID: 19807946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches.
Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):399-417. PubMed ID: 22563845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to do a meta-analysis.
Field AP; Gillett R
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):665-94. PubMed ID: 20497626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using Lancaster's mid-P correction to the Fisher's exact test for adverse impact analyses.
Biddle DA; Morris SB
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):956-65. PubMed ID: 21688881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Viechtbauer W
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo randomization tests for large-scale abundance datasets on the GPU.
Van Hemert JL; Dickerson JA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jan; 101(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 20541280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association.
McIntyre LM; Martin ER; Simonsen KL; Kaplan NL
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computing power in case-control association studies through the use of quadratic approximations: application to meta-statistics.
Guedj M; Della-Chiesa E; Picard F; Nuel G
Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):262-70. PubMed ID: 17032289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
Lui KJ; Chang KC
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating slope and level change in N = 1 designs.
Solanas A; Manolov R; Onghena P
Behav Modif; 2010 May; 34(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 20234005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
