These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20031104)

  • 1. Peer review in early career: just say yes!
    Roy-Byrne PP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1602-3. PubMed ID: 20031104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.
    Gelenberg AJ
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The review process, from manuscript to paper].
    van Harten PN
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2008; 50(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 18188822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Support for peer review.
    Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What can CCR do for you?
    Potash J; Anderson KC
    Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Aug; 16(16):4069-70. PubMed ID: 20682715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentaries on peer review and the evolving journal.
    Freeman MP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1598. PubMed ID: 20031099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The peer review process: education versus control.
    Newman DE; Luft LL
    Am J Psychiatry; 1974 Dec; 131(12):1363-6. PubMed ID: 4432935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can scientific quality be quantified?
    Loscalzo J
    Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(9):947-50. PubMed ID: 21382902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journal peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review for residents.
    Patel M; Hardy DW; Chand R
    Acad Psychiatry; 2005; 29(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 16387976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Submission of articles to Vaccine: a fast and fair peer review process.
    de Hon F; Poland GA
    Vaccine; 2013 Jul; 31(32):3207-8. PubMed ID: 23726824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How would you recognise a good review?
    Perkins D
    Aust J Rural Health; 2014 Aug; 22(4):143-4. PubMed ID: 25123615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registered reports: prospective peer review emphasizes science over spin.
    Wilkinson J; Pellicer A; Niederberger C
    Fertil Steril; 2019 May; 111(5):831-832. PubMed ID: 30955845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.