140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20031251)
1. Can an appropriateness evaluation tool be used to prioritize patients on a waiting list for cataract extraction?
Las Hayas C; González N; Aguirre U; Blasco JA; Elizalde B; Perea E; Escobar A; Navarro G; Castells X; Quintana JM;
Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):194-203. PubMed ID: 20031251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of priority criteria for cataract extraction.
Gutiérrez SG; Quintana JM; Bilbao A; Escobar A; Milla EP; Elizalde B; Baré M; Fernandez de Larrea N;
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):675-84. PubMed ID: 19674219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prioritization of patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery: validation of the Western Canada waiting list project cataract priority criteria tool.
Conner-Spady BL; Sanmugasunderam S; Courtright P; Mildon D; McGurran JJ; Noseworthy TW;
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 16019691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of newly developed appropriateness criteria for cataract surgery.
Quintana JM; Escobar A; Bilbao A; Blasco JA; Lacalle JR; Bare M; Begiristain JM;
Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):409-417.e3. PubMed ID: 18973949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prioritization of cataract surgery: visual analogue scale versus scoring system.
Wong VW; Lai TY; Lam PT; Lam DS
ANZ J Surg; 2005 Jul; 75(7):587-92. PubMed ID: 15972053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential for 2 priority systems to be used as appropriateness of indication tools for cataract surgery.
Las Hayas C; Quintana JM; Espallargues M; Vrotsou K; Allepuz A; Escobar A; Moharra M
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):e1-7. PubMed ID: 20383913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision trees for indication of cataract surgery based on changes in visual acuity.
Quintana JM; Arostegui I; Alberdi T; Escobar A; Perea E; Navarro G; Elizalde B; Andradas E;
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1471-8, 1478.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20416951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NIKE: a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery.
Lundström M; Albrecht S; Håkansson I; Lorefors R; Ohlsson S; Polland W; Schmid A; Svensson G; Wendel E
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Aug; 84(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 16879570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Waiting list management: priority criteria or first-in first-out? A case for total joint replacement.
Escobar A; Quintana JM; González M; Bilbao A; Ibañez B
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 19674214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Pyhäjärvi Cataract Study. I. Study design, baseline characteristics and the demand for cataract surgery.
Falck A; Kuoppala J; Winblad I; Tuulonen A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 18093260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a prioritization tool for patients on the waiting list for total hip and knee replacements.
Escobar A; González M; Quintana JM; Bilbao A; Ibañez B
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 19239588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and assessment of a priority score for cataract surgery.
Fantini MP; Negro A; Accorsi S; Cisbani L; Taroni F; Grilli R
Can J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15040614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How fair is cataract prioritisation?
Halliwell T
N Z Med J; 1998 Oct; 111(1076):405-7. PubMed ID: 9830430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New Zealand's Auckland region: a comparison between the clinical priority assessment criteria score and the actual clinical priority assigned.
Seddon M; Broad J; Crengle S; Bramley D; Jackson R; White H
N Z Med J; 2006 Mar; 119(1230):U1881. PubMed ID: 16532047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 3 systems for assigning priority to patients on waiting lists for cataract extraction.
Quintana JM; Espallargues M; Las Hayas C; Allepuz A; Vrotsou K; Moharra M; Escobar A
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20379295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generic surgical priority criteria scoring system: the clinical reality.
Dennett ER; Parry BR
N Z Med J; 1998 May; 111(1065):163-6. PubMed ID: 9612483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.
Quintana JM; Escobar A; Aróstegui I
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Mar; 6():23. PubMed ID: 16512906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impairment of visual acuity and reading performance and the relationship with cataract type and density.
Stifter E; Sacu S; Benesch T; Weghaupt H
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2071-5. PubMed ID: 15914625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery.
Ma Quintana J; Escobar A; Bilbao A;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Mar; 6():24. PubMed ID: 16512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indication criteria for cataract extraction and gender differences in waiting time.
Smirthwaite G; Lundström M; Albrecht S; Swahnberg K
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 92(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 23981482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
