These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20031790)

  • 1. Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.
    Austin PC
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2008 Sep; 1(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 20031790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.
    Austin PC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Nov; 134(5):1128-35. PubMed ID: 17976439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines.
    Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Apr; 5(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 20949126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Review of Propensity-Score Methods and Their Use in Cardiovascular Research.
    Deb S; Austin PC; Tu JV; Ko DT; Mazer CD; Kiss A; Fremes SE
    Can J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 32(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 26315351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity scores: Methods, considerations, and applications in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
    McMurry TL; Hu Y; Blackstone EH; Kozower BD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jul; 150(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 25963441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of propensity score used in cardiovascular research: a cross-sectional survey and guidance document.
    Samuel M; Batomen B; Rouette J; Kim J; Platt RW; Brophy JM; Kaufman JS
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e036961. PubMed ID: 32847911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: a systematic review.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Pestman WR; Hoes AW; Roes KC; Boer Ad; Klungel OH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 25433444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical appraisal of the application of propensity score methods in the urology literature.
    Nayan M; Hamilton RJ; Juurlink DN; Finelli A; Kulkarni GS; Austin PC
    BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):873-880. PubMed ID: 28608364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity score matching in otolaryngologic literature: A systematic review and critical appraisal.
    Prasad A; Shin M; Carey RM; Chorath K; Parhar H; Appel S; Moreira A; Rajasekaran K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244423. PubMed ID: 33382777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study.
    Austin PC; Small DS
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4306-19. PubMed ID: 25087884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity score matching and complex surveys.
    Austin PC; Jembere N; Chiu M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1240-1257. PubMed ID: 27460539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.
    Austin PC
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(6):661-77. PubMed ID: 19684288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical Studies.
    Yao XI; Wang X; Speicher PJ; Hwang ES; Cheng P; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Schrag D; Pang HH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Aug; 109(8):. PubMed ID: 28376195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 172(9):1092-7. PubMed ID: 20802241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research.
    Barnieh L; James MT; Zhang J; Hemmelgarn BR
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 21404223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.