These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2003204)

  • 1. FDA approvals. New drugs, new uses.
    Rodman MJ
    RN; 1991 Mar; 54(3):61-8. PubMed ID: 2003204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The history and contemporary challenges of the US Food and Drug Administration.
    Borchers AT; Hagie F; Keen CL; Gershwin ME
    Clin Ther; 2007 Jan; 29(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17379043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDA new drug approvals in 2009.
    Wynn RL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 20591770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The United States Food and Drug Administration and the practice of optometry.
    Lowther GE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 May; 50(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 379116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biopharmaceutic equivalency and the role of the Food & Drug Administration.
    Hodges RM
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1968 Mar; 25(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 5658859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significant FDA approvals in 1988.
    Nightingale SL
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):315-6. PubMed ID: 2729045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significant FDA approvals in 1990.
    Rheinstein PH
    Am Fam Physician; 1991 Jun; 43(6):2257-8. PubMed ID: 2042556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FDA reiterates warning against online drug buying.
    Rados C
    FDA Consum; 2004; 38(5):17. PubMed ID: 15595143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significant FDA approvals in 1989.
    Nightingale SL
    Am Fam Physician; 1990 Jun; 41(6):1851-2. PubMed ID: 2349910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDA new drug approvals in 2003.
    Wynn RL
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(4):294-8, 300. PubMed ID: 15366292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New drugs.
    Hussar DA
    Nursing; 1992 May; 22(5):55-61. PubMed ID: 1584496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should the FDA impose relative efficacy judgments?
    Stetler CJ
    Tex Med; 1972 Nov; 68(11):48-52. PubMed ID: 4634627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FDA 'efficacy' rule: does it work?
    Lasagna L
    Mo Med; 1971 Sep; 68(9):712-4. PubMed ID: 5570164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FDA pressure?
    Appleton BL
    Nature; 1990 Mar; 344(6262):99. PubMed ID: 2308647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New classification of drugs.
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1972 Jan; 59(1):37. PubMed ID: 5058956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New drugs and product approvals from 2000.
    Taylor SE; Gage TW
    Tex Dent J; 2001 Nov; 118(11):1070-81. PubMed ID: 11806330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FDA inspections of large volume and small volume parenteral manufacturers.
    Shepherd RE
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1976; 30(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 974306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ADA, FDA guard quality, safety.
    Dent Stud; 1975 Mar; 53(6):25, 55. PubMed ID: 1055065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of regulatory agencies and industry in assessment of the safety of drugs for use in man. United States Food and Drug Administration's viewpoint.
    Ley HL; Desmond FH
    Can Med Assoc J; 1968 Feb; 98(6):318-21. PubMed ID: 5636100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The brand name versus generic controversy: Is there a segment of the pharmaceutical industry that produces drugs of higher quality?
    Marsh DA; Hoar ME
    Contemp Pharm Pract; 1982; 5(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10317245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.