These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2003215)

  • 1. NIH takes heat for lax investigation.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1305. PubMed ID: 2003215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reassignment for NIH's fraud hunters.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1993 May; 341(8854):1204-5. PubMed ID: 8098089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduce fraud in seven easy steps.
    Norman C
    Science; 1984 May; 224(4649):581. PubMed ID: 6710157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientists get mad at OSI. Richards Panel: out of the loop?
    Palca J
    Science; 1991 Jun; 252(5013):1606-7. PubMed ID: 2047866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OSI's conclusions wrong.
    Imanishi-Kari T
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6325):344-5. PubMed ID: 2034282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US congressman attacks NIH investigation.
    Anderson A; Palca J
    Nature; 1988 Nov; 336(6197):295. PubMed ID: 3194012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conduct unbecoming?
    Weiss P
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Office of scientific integrity.
    Mason JO
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):903-4. PubMed ID: 2543069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH panel finds no fraud in Cell paper but cites errors.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1499. PubMed ID: 3201234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whistle-blowers air cases at house hearings.
    Holden C
    Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4851):386-7. PubMed ID: 3358123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fraud squad.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8682):155-6. PubMed ID: 1967443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What next in the Gallo case?
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):944-5. PubMed ID: 1948080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH misconduct procedures: effect of new ruling.
    Hallum JV; Hadley SW
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1296. PubMed ID: 2003214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH finds fraud in cell paper.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552-4. PubMed ID: 2011731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigations into NIH fraud allegations end with suicide.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1987 Feb 19-25; 325(6106):652. PubMed ID: 3821857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper.
    Fackelmann KA
    Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Science police.
    Dolnick E
    Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.