182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20032151)
1. Characterization of adrenal lesions: comparison of 2D and 3D dual gradient-echo MR imaging at 3 T--preliminary results.
Marin D; Soher BJ; Dale BM; Boll DT; Youngblood RS; Merkle EM
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 20032151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of adrenal lesions with 1.5-T MRI: preliminary observations on comparison of three in-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo techniques.
Ramalho M; de Campos RO; Heredia V; Dale BM; Tannaphai P; Azevedo RM; Semelka RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):415-23. PubMed ID: 21785088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of echo time pair selection on quantitative analysis for adrenal tumor characterization with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging: initial experience.
Schindera ST; Soher BJ; Delong DM; Dale BM; Merkle EM
Radiology; 2008 Jul; 248(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 18566172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of adrenal masses: value of chemical-shift imaging for distinguishing adenomas from other tumors.
Bilbey JH; McLoughlin RF; Kurkjian PS; Wilkins GE; Chan NH; Schmidt N; Singer J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):637-42. PubMed ID: 7863885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR pulmonary angiography, contrast-enhanced low-flip angle 3D GRE, and nonenhanced free-induction FISP sequences.
Kalb B; Sharma P; Tigges S; Ray GL; Kitajima HD; Costello JR; Chen Z; Martin DR
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):271-8. PubMed ID: 22438448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of adrenal masses (< 5 cm) by use of chemical shift MR imaging: observer performance versus quantitative measures.
Mayo-Smith WW; Lee MJ; McNicholas MM; Hahn PF; Boland GW; Saini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7785642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 3D two-point Dixon and standard 2D dual-echo breath-hold sequences for detection and quantification of fat content in renal angiomyolipoma.
Rosenkrantz AB; Raj S; Babb JS; Chandarana H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21126839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo imaging in abdominal studies: intra-individual comparison of three different techniques.
Ramalho M; Herédia V; de Campos RO; Dale BM; Azevedo RM; Semelka RC
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 22535885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of adrenal lesions using chemical shift MRI: comparison between 1.5 Tesla and two echo time pair selection at 3.0 Tesla MRI.
Nakamura S; Namimoto T; Morita K; Utsunomiya D; Oda S; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Yamashita Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 35(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 22002867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of T1-weighted in- and out-of-phase single shot magnetization-prepared gradient-recalled-echo with three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo at 3.0 Tesla: preliminary observations in abdominal studies.
Ferreira A; Ramalho M; de Campos RO; Heredia V; Azevedo RM; Dale B; Semelka RC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 35(5):1187-95. PubMed ID: 22128047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of malignant from benign pheochromocytomas with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance at 3.0 T.
Dong Y; Liu Q
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 22805661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of acetabular labral tears: comparison of three-dimensional intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with two-dimensional MR arthrography at 3.0 T.
Park SY; Park JS; Jin W; Rhyu KH; Ryu KN
Acta Radiol; 2013 Feb; 54(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 23093725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adrenal masses: quantification of fat content with double-echo chemical shift in-phase and opposed-phase FLASH MR images for differentiation of adrenal adenomas.
Namimoto T; Yamashita Y; Mitsuzaki K; Nakayama Y; Makita O; Kadota M; Takahashi M
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):642-6. PubMed ID: 11230633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of delayed enhanced CT and chemical shift MR for evaluating hyperattenuating incidental adrenal masses.
Park BK; Kim CK; Kim B; Lee JH
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):760-5. PubMed ID: 17517932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adrenal adenoma and metastasis from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: can they be differentiated using standard MR techniques?
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Nov; 55(9):1120-8. PubMed ID: 24252816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional isotropic shoulder MR arthrography: comparison with two-dimensional MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions at 3.0 T.
Jung JY; Yoon YC; Choi SH; Kwon JW; Yoo J; Choe BK
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 19188318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes?
Lahaye MJ; Beets GL; Engelen SM; Kessels AG; de Bruïne AP; Kwee HW; van Engelshoven JM; van de Velde CJ; Beets-Tan RG
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 19403848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of adrenal tumors by chemical shift fast low-angle shot MR imaging: comparison of four methods of quantitative evaluation.
Fujiyoshi F; Nakajo M; Fukukura Y; Tsuchimochi S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jun; 180(6):1649-57. PubMed ID: 12760936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging.
Kim H; Lim JS; Choi JY; Park J; Chung YE; Kim MJ; Choi E; Kim NK; Kim KW
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 20093520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
