199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20032256)
1. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for Clostridium difficile infection.
Swindells J; Brenwald N; Reading N; Oppenheim B
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 48(2):606-8. PubMed ID: 20032256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.
Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. C. Diff Quik Chek complete enzyme immunoassay provides a reliable first-line method for detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.
Quinn CD; Sefers SE; Babiker W; He Y; Alcabasa R; Stratton CW; Carroll KC; Tang YW
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 48(2):603-5. PubMed ID: 19955275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is a two-step glutamate dehyrogenase antigen-cytotoxicity neutralization assay algorithm superior to the premier toxin A and B enzyme immunoassay for laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile?
Gilligan PH
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):1523-5. PubMed ID: 18256226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between Clostridium difficile bacterial load, commercial real-time PCR cycle thresholds, and results of diagnostic tests based on enzyme immunoassay and cell culture cytotoxicity assay.
Dionne LL; Raymond F; Corbeil J; Longtin J; Gervais P; Longtin Y
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Nov; 51(11):3624-30. PubMed ID: 23966497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time PCR to the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay for diagnosis of clostridium difficile infections.
Huang H; Weintraub A; Fang H; Nord CE
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 47(11):3729-31. PubMed ID: 19741082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.
Stamper PD; Alcabasa R; Aird D; Babiker W; Wehrlin J; Ikpeama I; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 47(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 19073875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Sloan LM; Duresko BJ; Gustafson DR; Rosenblatt JE
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 18434563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.
Aichinger E; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Nyre LM; Patel R
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 46(11):3795-7. PubMed ID: 18784320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in diarrheal stools by real-time PCR.
Barbut F; Braun M; Burghoffer B; Lalande V; Eckert C
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):1276-7. PubMed ID: 19244461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.
Stamper PD; Babiker W; Alcabasa R; Aird D; Wehrlin J; Ikpeama I; Gluck L; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):3846-50. PubMed ID: 19846637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of six commercial assays for the rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxin and/or antigen in stool specimens.
Vanpoucke H; De Baere T; Claeys G; Vaneechoutte M; Verschraegen G
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2001 Feb; 7(2):55-64. PubMed ID: 11298143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an automated rapid diagnostic test for detection of Clostridium difficile.
Tojo M; Nagamatsu M; Hayakawa K; Mezaki K; Kirikae T; Ohmagari N
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e106102. PubMed ID: 25170836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three commercial methods for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B from fecal specimens.
Alcalá L; Sánchez-Cambronero L; Catalán MP; Sánchez-Somolinos M; Peláez MT; Marín M; Bouza E
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 46(11):3833-5. PubMed ID: 18784313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A and its use in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated disease.
DiPersio JR; Varga FJ; Conwell DL; Kraft JA; Kozak KJ; Willis DH
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Dec; 29(12):2724-30. PubMed ID: 1757540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Shin BM; Kuak EY; Lee EJ; Songer JG
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2952-6. PubMed ID: 19625481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile.
Fenner L; Widmer AF; Goy G; Rudin S; Frei R
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):328-30. PubMed ID: 18032627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in the use of laboratory tests for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection and association with incidence rates in Quebec, Canada, 2010-2014.
Bogaty C; Lévesque S; Garenc C; Frenette C; Bolduc D; Galarneau LA; Lalancette C; Loo V; Tremblay C; Trudeau M; Vachon J; Dionne M; Villeneuve J; Longtin J; Longtin Y;
Am J Infect Control; 2017 Sep; 45(9):964-968. PubMed ID: 28549882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
