These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20032608)

  • 1. Linear measurements to determine working length of curved canals with fine files: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Brito-Júnior M; Santos LA; Baleeiro EN; Pêgo MM; Eleutério NB; Camilo CC
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 51(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 20032608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
    Mentes A; Gencoglu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11805781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments.
    Fuge KN; Stuck AM; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Mar; 31(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9868939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apical fit of initial K-files in maxillary molars assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Zehnder M; Marending M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Apr; 43(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 20487453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial apical fit of K-files versus LightSpeed LSX instruments assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Marending M; Schicht OO; Paqué F
    Int Endod J; 2012 Feb; 45(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 21992481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of X-ray beam angulation and intraradicular contrast medium on radiographic interpretation of lower first molar root canal anatomy.
    Naoum HJ; Love RM; Chandler NP; Herbison P
    Int Endod J; 2003 Jan; 36(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12656509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with two palatal canals with the aid of spiral computed tomography: a case report.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Logani A; Shah N
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 19084144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions.
    Friedlander LT; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 11925542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
    J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. II. In vivo evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA; Hollender LG; Harrington GW
    J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 8596074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional versus storage phosphor-plate digital images to visualize the root canal system contrasted with a radiopaque medium.
    Naoum HJ; Chandler NP; Love RM
    J Endod; 2003 May; 29(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 12775009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.