These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20032615)

  • 1. Effects of sonic scaling on the surface roughness of restorative materials.
    Mourouzis P; Koulaouzidou EA; Vassiliadis L; Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 51(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 20032615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of sonic and ultrasonic scaling on the surface roughness of tooth-colored restorative materials for cervical lesions.
    Lai YL; Lin YC; Chang CS; Lee SY
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 17555179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB; Biskin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials.
    Grossman ES; Rosen M; Cleaton-Jones PE; Volchansky A
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):274, 276, 278-9. PubMed ID: 15537027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Neme AL; Frazier KB; Roeder LB; Debner TL
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials.
    Carr MP; Mitchell JC; Seghi RR; Vermilyea SG
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 12116510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of four prophylaxis pastes on surface roughness of a composite, a hybrid ionomer, and a compomer restorative material.
    Warren DP; Colescott TD; Henson HA; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 12214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study.
    Bagheri R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 17207080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials.
    Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N; Karabulut E
    Dent Mater J; 2008 Nov; 27(6):755-64. PubMed ID: 19241682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing.
    Joniot S; Salomon JP; Dejou J; Grégoire G
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16536192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Perez Cdos R; Hirata RJ; da Silva AH; Sampaio EM; de Miranda MS
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 19953776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gradual surface degradation of restorative materials by acidic agents.
    Hengtrakool C; Kukiattrakoon B; Kedjarune-Leggat U
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e50-62. PubMed ID: 21903509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.