218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033153)
1. Use of (99m)Tc-MDP SPECT for assessment of mandibular growth: development of normal values.
Fahey FH; Abramson ZR; Padwa BL; Zimmerman RE; Zurakowski D; Nissenbaum M; Kaban LB; Treves ST
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 May; 37(5):1002-10. PubMed ID: 20033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative bone SPECT analysis of mandibular condyles in an asymptomatic population: an approach to normal reference values.
Anzola F LK; Moron A S; Jaramillo C MC; Quijano G DC; Hernandez H N; González A E; Rodriguez I; Moreno L SM; Amador P E; Orozco F M; Mut F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 50(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 33279376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of
López Buitrago DF; Ruiz Botero J; Corral CM; Carmona AR; Sabogal A
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(4):207-211. PubMed ID: 28256425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The potential of hybrid SPECT/CT fusion imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy in the scintigraphic quantitative functional assessment of suspected unilateral mandibular hyperactivity.
Kao YH; Magsombol BM; Ng DC
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 16(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 21207236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of SPECT to evaluate growth cessation of the mandible in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Pripatnanont P; Vittayakittipong P; Markmanee U; Thongmak S; Yipintsoi T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 34(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 16053843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography without and with Hybrid Computed Tomography in Mandibular Condylar Hyperplasia.
Theerakulpisut D; Somboonporn C; Wongsurawat N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Aug; 99 Suppl 5():S65-73. PubMed ID: 29905456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of four methods for quantitative assessment of
López Buitrago DF; Muñoz Acosta JM; Cárdenas-Perilla RA
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(2):72-79. PubMed ID: 30579914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of planar bone scintigraphy and single photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of active condylar hyperplasia.
López B DF; Corral S CM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 44(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 26625976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized skeletal scintigraphy for assessment of mandibular asymmetry.
Cisneros GJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1984 Aug; 42(8):513-20. PubMed ID: 6234385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reference values of mandibular condyles metabolic activity: A study using
López DF; Castro MA; Muñoz JM; Cárdenas-Perilla R
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Aug; 24(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 33090651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of single-photon emission computed tomography and planar imaging for quantitative skeletal scintigraphy of the mandibular condyle.
Pogrel MA; Kopf J; Dodson TB; Hattner R; Kaban LB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 7552889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Planar versus SPET imaging in the assessment of condylar growth.
Chan WL; Carolan MG; Fernandes VB; Abbati DP
Nucl Med Commun; 2000 Mar; 21(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 10823331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incremental value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of active condylar hyperplasia.
Agarwal KK; Mukherjee A; St A; Tripathi M; Bal C
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 27763953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver variation of single-photon emission computed tomography bone scans in patients evaluated for unilateral condylar hyperactivity.
Karssemakers LH; Raijmakers PG; Nolte JW; Tuinzing DB; Becking AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Mar; 115(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 23453031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardization of quantitative single photon emission computed tomography in control individuals and in patients with condylar hyperplasia.
AlSharif AA; Tarawneh ES; AlKawaleet YI; Abukaraky AE; AlAhmad HT; Malkawi ZA; Juweid ME
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1268-76. PubMed ID: 24594982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of three analysis methods for
Rushinek H; Tabib R; Fleissig Y; Klein M; Tshori S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1607-1613. PubMed ID: 27475465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of relative uptake by mandibular condyles in a "normal" population.
Fernandes AR; Faria MT; Oliveira A; Barata Coelho P; Pereira JG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 30904203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Histopathologic Validation Study.
Mostafa NM; Moustafa S; Hussien MT; Ali WA; Osman MH; Shahine MS; Abdelhafez YG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 79(5):1083.e1-1083.e10. PubMed ID: 33358710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of
Parghane RV; Singh B; Sharma A; Singh H; Singh P; Bhattacharya A
J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Dec; 45(4):280-284. PubMed ID: 28798229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SPECT bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis and management of mandibular condylar hyperplasia.
Hodder SC; Rees JI; Oliver TB; Facey PE; Sugar AW
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 38(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 10864700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
