These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033159)
1. Hawaiian residents' preferences for Miconia control program attributes using conjoint choice experiment and latent class analysis. Chan-Halbrendt C; Lin T; Yang F; Sisior G Environ Manage; 2010 Feb; 45(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 20033159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biology and host preferences of Cryptorhynchus melastomae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a possible biocontrol agent for Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae) in Hawaii. Reichert E; Johnson MT; Chacón E; Anderson RS; Wheeler TA Environ Entomol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1848-57. PubMed ID: 22182550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Public Preference Heterogeneity and Predicted Uptake Rate of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening Programs in Rural China: Discrete Choice Experiments and Latent Class Analysis. Liu R; Li Q; Li Y; Wei W; Ma S; Wang J; Zhang N JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2023 Jul; 9():e42898. PubMed ID: 37428530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Socioeconomic differences in preferences and willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery systems in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Guimarães C; Marra CA; Colley L; Gill S; Simpson S; Meneilly G; Queiroz RH; Lynd LD Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):567-73. PubMed ID: 19764835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling the problem-based learning preferences of McMaster University undergraduate medical students using a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Cunningham CE; Deal K; Neville A; Rimas H; Lohfeld L Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 Aug; 11(3):245-66. PubMed ID: 16832708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuing the benefits of weight loss programs: an application of the discrete choice experiment. Roux L; Ubach C; Donaldson C; Ryan M Obes Res; 2004 Aug; 12(8):1342-51. PubMed ID: 15340118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additions to the mycobiota of the invasive weed Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae). Alves JL; Barreto RW; Pereira OL; Soares DJ Mycologia; 2010; 102(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 20120231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo assessment of DNA damage and protective effects of extracts from Miconia species using the comet assay and micronucleus test. Serpeloni JM; Bisarro dos Reis M; Rodrigues J; Campaner dos Santos L; Vilegas W; Varanda EA; Dokkedal AL; Cólus IM Mutagenesis; 2008 Nov; 23(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 18765422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment. Morey E; Thacher JA; Craighead WE J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 17603148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use--an evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis. Hurlimann A; McKay J J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 16678338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fungal pathogens of Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae) from Brazil, with reference to classical biological control. Seixas CD; Barreto RW; Killgore E Mycologia; 2007; 99(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 17663128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Damage to Miconia calvescens and seasonal abundance of Salbia lotanalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Costa Rica. Badenes-Perez FR; Castillo A; Johnson MT Environ Entomol; 2014 Aug; 43(4):877-82. PubMed ID: 25182612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population preferences and choice of primary care models: a discrete choice experiment in Sweden. Hjelmgren J; Anell A Health Policy; 2007 Oct; 83(2-3):314-22. PubMed ID: 17376559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using choice experiments to assess people's preferences for railway transports of hazardous materials. Winslott Hiselius L Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1199-214. PubMed ID: 16297225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation. Ratcliffe J; Buxton M Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):340-51. PubMed ID: 10507193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: a conjoint analysis study. Fitzpatrick E; Coyle DE; Durieux-Smith A; Graham ID; Angus DE; Gaboury I Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):842-9. PubMed ID: 17982370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice. Shaller D Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urban residents' priorities for neighborhood features. A survey of New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina. Hong T; Farley TA Am J Prev Med; 2008 Apr; 34(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 18374251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences. Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physicians as managers: psychiatry residents' perceived gaps in knowledge and skills in administrative psychiatry. Sockalingam S; Stergiopoulos V; Maggi J Acad Psychiatry; 2007; 31(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 17626193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]