199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033178)
1. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI.
Caproni N; Marchisio F; Pecchi A; Canossi B; Battista R; D'Alimonte P; Torricelli P
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1384-95. PubMed ID: 20033178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang L; Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Hua J; Wan CF
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1805-14. PubMed ID: 24065262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Wan C; Du J; Fang H; Li F; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e444-50. PubMed ID: 21612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound score and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis: correlation with biological factors.
Jia WR; Chai WM; Tang L; Wang Y; Fei XC; Han BS; Chen M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1098-1105. PubMed ID: 24794865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.
Schellhaas B; Görtz RS; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Neurath MF; Strobel D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 28562394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast imaging: is the sonographic descriptor of orientation valid for magnetic resonance imaging?
Oliveira TM; Brasileiro Sant'Anna TK; Mauad FM; Elias J; Muglia VF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22911937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-time MRI navigated US: role in diagnosis and guided biopsy of incidental breast lesions and axillary lymph nodes detected on breast MRI but not on second look US.
Pons EP; Azcón FM; Casas MC; Meca SM; Espona JLG
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jun; 83(6):942-950. PubMed ID: 24725672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using real-time contrast harmonic imaging in invasive breast cancer: comparison of enhancement dynamics with three different doses of contrast agent.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Tánczos E; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24445092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of second-look ultrasound of BIRADS-3 mammary lesions detected by breast MR imaging.
Fiaschetti V; Salimbeni C; Gaspari E; Dembele GK; Bolacchi F; Cossu E; Pistolese CA; Perretta T; Simonetti G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3178-84. PubMed ID: 22417393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: assessment of diagnostic accuracy.
Nemec U; Nemec SF; Novotny C; Weber M; Czerny C; Krestan CR
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1357-65. PubMed ID: 22322310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Tumors.
Pan J; Chen W; Zhang H; Huang X; Huang X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):261-271. PubMed ID: 33153806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power Doppler sonography: anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?
Gokalp G; Topal U; Kizilkaya E
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 18243623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Zhao H; Xu R; Ouyang Q; Chen L; Dong B; Huihua Y
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 19559551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Wang Y; Fan W; Zhao S; Zhang K; Zhang L; Zhang P; Ma R
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26724648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the detection of periampullary cancer: Comparison with B-mode ultrasonography and MR imaging.
Zhang T; Su ZZ; Wang P; Wu T; Tang W; Xu EJ; Ju JX; Quan XY; Zheng RQ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 27776651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.
Nakata N; Ohta T; Nishioka M; Takeyama H; Toriumi Y; Kato K; Nogi H; Kamio M; Fukuda K
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1969-76. PubMed ID: 26384607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast tumors using kinetic features of real-time harmonic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Wilczek B; Celebioglu F; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 22434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
