BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033247)

  • 1. Context effects in the discriminability of spatial cues.
    Maier JK; McAlpine D; Klump GM; Pressnitzer D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):319-28. PubMed ID: 20033247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetric transfer of sound localization learning between indistinguishable interaural cues.
    Sand A; Nilsson ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 232(6):1707-16. PubMed ID: 24566800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blind people are more sensitive than sighted people to binaural sound-location cues, particularly inter-aural level differences.
    Nilsson ME; Schenkman BN
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():223-232. PubMed ID: 26433052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
    Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.
    Higgins NC; McLaughlin SA; Rinne T; Stecker GC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):E7602-E7611. PubMed ID: 28827357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location.
    Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9908-21. PubMed ID: 27656028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.
    Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 22246139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.
    Schwartz A; McDermott JH; Shinn-Cunningham B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):357-68. PubMed ID: 22779483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.
    Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA; Eddins AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):737-748. PubMed ID: 31242052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural-cue Weighting and Training-Induced Reweighting Across Frequencies.
    Klingel M; Laback B
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221104872. PubMed ID: 35791626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural ITD statistics predict human auditory spatial perception.
    Pavão R; Sussman ES; Fischer BJ; Peña JL
    Elife; 2020 Oct; 9():. PubMed ID: 33043884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated processing of spatial cues in human auditory cortex.
    Salminen NH; Takanen M; Santala O; Lamminsalo J; Altoè A; Pulkki V
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():143-52. PubMed ID: 26074304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.
    Diedesch AC; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 26233013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discovering acoustic structure of novel sounds.
    Stilp CE; Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2460. PubMed ID: 29716264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonuniform temporal weighting of interaural time differences in 500 Hz tones.
    Stecker GC; Bibee JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3541-7. PubMed ID: 24907817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.