172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033271)
1. Extracting functional components of neural dynamics with Independent Component Analysis and inverse Current Source Density.
Lęski S; Kublik E; Swiejkowski DA; Wróbel A; Wójcik DK
J Comput Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 29(3):459-73. PubMed ID: 20033271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inverse modeling on decomposed electroencephalographic data: a way forward?
Lelic D; Gratkowski M; Valeriani M; Arendt-Nielsen L; Drewes AM
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 26(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 19584750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial Localization of Sources in the Rat Subthalamic Motor Region Using an Inverse Current Source Density Method.
van Dijk KJ; Janssen ML; Zwartjes DG; Temel Y; Visser-Vandewalle V; Veltink PH; Benazzouz A; Heida T
Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():87. PubMed ID: 27857684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of detailed time-frequency components in somatosensory evoked potentials.
Zhang Z; Luk KD; Hu Y
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Jun; 18(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 20215086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-trial correlation analysis of evoked potentials reveals arousal-related attenuation of thalamo-cortical coupling.
Sobolewski A; Kublik E; Swiejkowski DA; Lęski S; Kamiński JK; Wróbel A
J Comput Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 29(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 20177762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local contribution to the somatosensory evoked potentials in rat's thalamus.
Średniawa W; Borzymowska Z; Kondrakiewicz K; Jurgielewicz P; Mindur B; Hottowy P; Wójcik DK; Kublik E
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301713. PubMed ID: 38593141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of high-resolution current source density profiles: a simulation of sublaminar contributions to the visual evoked potential.
Tenke CE; Schroeder CE; Arezzo JC; Vaughan HG
Exp Brain Res; 1993; 94(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 8359238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microelectrode array analysis of hippocampal network dynamics following theta-burst stimulation via current source density reconstruction by Gaussian interpolation.
Kim HB; Oh TI; Swanberg KM; Lee MB; Kim TW; Woo EJ; Park JH; Kwon OI
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 May; 264():1-10. PubMed ID: 26880160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG.
Parra LC; Spence CD; Gerson AD; Sajda P
Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 16084117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory evoked potentials in the monkey. I. Early components.
Arezzo J; Legatt AD; Vaughan HG
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Feb; 46(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 86423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inverse current source density method in two dimensions: inferring neural activation from multielectrode recordings.
Łęski S; Pettersen KH; Tunstall B; Einevoll GT; Gigg J; Wójcik DK
Neuroinformatics; 2011 Dec; 9(4):401-25. PubMed ID: 21409556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential activation of microcircuits underlying somatosensory-evoked potentials in rat neocortex.
Jellema T; Brunia CH; Wadman WJ
Neuroscience; 2004; 129(2):283-95. PubMed ID: 15501587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removing artefacts from TMS-EEG recordings using independent component analysis: importance for assessing prefrontal and motor cortex network properties.
Rogasch NC; Thomson RH; Farzan F; Fitzgibbon BM; Bailey NW; Hernandez-Pavon JC; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():425-39. PubMed ID: 25067813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Information-based modeling of event-related brain dynamics.
Onton J; Makeig S
Prog Brain Res; 2006; 159():99-120. PubMed ID: 17071226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kernel current source density method.
Potworowski J; Jakuczun W; Lȩski S; Wójcik D
Neural Comput; 2012 Feb; 24(2):541-75. PubMed ID: 22091662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minor contribution of principal excitatory pathways to hippocampal LFPs in the anesthetized rat: a combined independent component and current source density study.
Korovaichuk A; Makarova J; Makarov VA; Benito N; Herreras O
J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):484-97. PubMed ID: 20463202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantifying additive evoked contributions to the event-related potential.
Turi G; Gotthardt S; Singer W; Vuong TA; Munk M; Wibral M
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2607-24. PubMed ID: 21982933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EEGIFT: group independent component analysis for event-related EEG data.
Eichele T; Rachakonda S; Brakedal B; Eikeland R; Calhoun VD
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():129365. PubMed ID: 21747835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis on subtracting projection of extracted independent components from EEG recordings.
Cong F; Kalyakin I; Chang Z; Ristaniemi T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2011 Aug; 56(4):223-34. PubMed ID: 21823999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
