BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033500)

  • 1. A fully 3D work context for oral implant planning and simulation.
    Chiarelli T; Lamma E; Sansoni T
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Jan; 5(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 20033500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From implant planning to surgical execution: an integrated approach for surgery in oral implantology.
    Chiarelli T; Franchini F; Lamma A; Lamma E; Sansoni T
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Mar; 8(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 22009914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT dataset anisotropy management for oral implantology planning software.
    Chiarelli T; Lamma E; Sansoni T
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Mar; 8(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 22707336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing implant surgery planning via computerized image processing.
    Cucchiara R; Franchini F; Lamma A; Lamma E; Sansoni T; Sarti E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jan; 4(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 11441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery. An approach using virtual reality.
    Verstreken K; Van Cleynenbreugel J; Marchal G; van Steenberghe D; Suetens P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():423-34. PubMed ID: 10163772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An image analysis approach for automatically re-orienteering CT images for dental implants.
    Cucchiara R; Lamma E; Sansoni T
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Jun; 28(4):185-201. PubMed ID: 15121208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An open system approach for surgical guide production.
    Abboud M; Orentlicher G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e519-24. PubMed ID: 22117708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation.
    Kalt G; Gehrke P
    Int J Comput Dent; 2008; 11(3-4):213-25. PubMed ID: 19216313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report.
    Terzioğlu H; Akkaya M; Ozan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19344037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning.
    Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; Schutyser F; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Research on the development of image guided oral implant system].
    Chen X; Lin Y; Wu Y; Wang C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):429-34, 438. PubMed ID: 18610636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
    Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided dental implant planning.
    Spector L
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):761-75, vi. PubMed ID: 18805228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant treatment software planning and guided flapless surgery with immediate provisional prosthesis delivery in the fully edentulous maxilla. A retrospective analysis of 15 consecutively treated patients.
    Meloni SM; De Riu G; Pisano M; Cattina G; Tullio A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20847994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Newly developed data-matching methodology for oral implant surgery allowing the automatic deletion of metal artifacts in 3D-CT images using new reference markers: A case report.
    Shimizu H; Arakawa H; Mino T; Kurosaki Y; Tokumoto K; Kuboki T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Feb; 65(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 32938868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing.
    Kernen F; Kramer J; Wanner L; Wismeijer D; Nelson K; Flügge T
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 32912273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.