BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033598)

  • 1. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
    Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer-aided detection of the architectural distortion in digital mammograms using the fractal dimension measurements of BEMD.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():173-184. PubMed ID: 29691123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Delong DM; Floyd CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1299-312. PubMed ID: 16481695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.
    Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Desautels JE
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):611-31. PubMed ID: 20127270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
    Georgiou H; Mavroforakis M; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical mode decomposition of digital mammograms for the statistical based characterization of architectural distortion.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():109-12. PubMed ID: 26736212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval-cancer cases with neural networks.
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6667-70. PubMed ID: 19964909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of performance improvement in content-based medical image retrieval schemes using fractal dimension.
    Park SC; Wang XH; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19524455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of breast ultrasound images using fractal feature.
    Chen DR; Chang RF; Chen CJ; Ho MF; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Hung SJ; Moon WK
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15967313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.
    Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Desautels JE
    J Vis Exp; 2013 Aug; (78):. PubMed ID: 24022326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 20851789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction to "Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms using Gabor filters, phase portraits, fractal dimension, and texture analysis [1]".
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Jul; 5(4):421-3. PubMed ID: 20232262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.
    Li H; Mendel KR; Lan L; Sheth D; Giger ML
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 30747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.
    Bliznakova K; Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5604-17. PubMed ID: 21158272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated analysis of mammographic densities.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 May; 41(5):909-23. PubMed ID: 8735257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
    Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.