These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20033825)

  • 1. Evaluation of hemostasis with soft coagulation using endoscopic hemostatic forceps in comparison with metallic hemoclips for bleeding gastric ulcers: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Arima S; Sakata Y; Ogata S; Tominaga N; Tsuruoka N; Mannen K; Shiraishi R; Shimoda R; Tsunada S; Sakata H; Iwakiri R; Fujimoto K
    J Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 45(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 20033825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of endoscopic hemostasis with metallic hemoclips for bleeding gastric ulcer: comparison with endoscopic injection of absolute ethanol in a prospective, randomized study.
    Shimoda R; Iwakiri R; Sakata H; Ogata S; Kikkawa A; Ootani H; Oda K; Ootani A; Tsunada S; Fujimoto K
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2198-202. PubMed ID: 14572568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic hemostasis of gastric ulcer bleeding by hemostatic forceps coagulation.
    Nagata S; Kimura S; Ogoshi H; Hidaka T
    Dig Endosc; 2010 Jul; 22 Suppl 1():S22-5. PubMed ID: 20590766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Randomized Trial of Monopolar Soft-mode Coagulation Versus Heater Probe Thermocoagulation for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.
    Nunoue T; Takenaka R; Hori K; Okazaki N; Hamada K; Baba Y; Yamasaki Y; Kono Y; Seki H; Inokuchi T; Takemoto K; Taira A; Tsugeno H; Fujiki S; Kawahara Y; Okada H
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 25083773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective multicenter study concerning electrocautery forceps with soft coagulation for nonmalignant gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding in Japan.
    Fujishiro M; Abe N; Endo M; Kawahara Y; Shimoda R; Nagata S; Homma K; Morita Y; Uedo N
    Dig Endosc; 2010 Jul; 22 Suppl 1():S15-8. PubMed ID: 20590763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of hemostasis using bipolar hemostatic forceps with hemostasis by endoscopic hemoclipping for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a prospective non-randomized trial.
    Kataoka M; Kawai T; Hayama Y; Yamamoto K; Nonaka M; Aoki T; Yagi K; Fukuzawa M; Fukuzawa M; Moriyasu F
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Aug; 27(8):3035-8. PubMed ID: 23468331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcer--a randomized trial.
    Kim JW; Jang JY; Lee CK; Shim JJ; Chang YW
    Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):680-7. PubMed ID: 25730283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the hemostatic efficacy of the endoscopic hemoclip method with hypertonic saline-epinephrine injection and a combination of the two for the management of bleeding peptic ulcers.
    Chung IK; Ham JS; Kim HS; Park SH; Lee MH; Kim SJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Jan; 49(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video).
    Toka B; Eminler AT; Karacaer C; Uslan MI; Koksal AS; Parlak E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Apr; 89(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 30342026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monopolar soft-mode coagulation using hemostatic forceps for peptic ulcer bleeding.
    Yamasaki Y; Takenaka R; Nunoue T; Kono Y; Takemoto K; Taira A; Tsugeno H; Fujiki S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2014; 61(136):2272-6. PubMed ID: 25699366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monopolar coagulation versus conventional endoscopic treatment for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective, randomized study.
    Soon MS; Wu SS; Chen YY; Fan CS; Lin OS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Sep; 58(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 14528202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a live animal model for training in endoscopic hemostasis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding ulcers.
    Camus M; Marteau P; Pocard M; Bal Dit Sollier C; Lavergne-Slove A; Thibault A; Lecleire S; Vienne A; Coffin B; Drouet L; Dray X
    Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 23733728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective, randomized comparison of 10-Fr versus 7-Fr bipolar electrocoagulation catheter in combination with adrenaline injection in the endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.
    Paspatis GA; Charoniti I; Papanikolaou N; Vardas E; Chlouverakis G
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2192-7. PubMed ID: 14572567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized controlled trial comparing epinephrine injection plus heat probe coagulation versus epinephrine injection plus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcers.
    Chau CH; Siu WT; Law BK; Tang CN; Kwok SY; Luk YW; Lao WC; Li MK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Apr; 57(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 12665753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review and meta-analysis: monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding.
    Kamal F; Khan MA; Tariq R; Ismail MK; Tombazzi C; Howden CW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jun; 32(6):678-685. PubMed ID: 32317587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic factors predisposing to rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers.
    Chung IK; Kim EJ; Lee MS; Kim HS; Park SH; Lee MH; Kim SJ; Cho MS; Hwang KY
    Endoscopy; 2001 Nov; 33(11):969-75. PubMed ID: 11668406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oral proton pump inhibitors are as effective as endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Kim JI; Cheung DY; Cho SH; Park SH; Han JY; Kim JK; Han SW; Choi KY; Chung IS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2007 Dec; 52(12):3371-6. PubMed ID: 17514424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoclips vs large or small-volume epinephrine in peptic ulcer recurrent bleeding.
    Ljubicic N; Budimir I; Biscanin A; Nikolic M; Supanc V; Hrabar D; Pavic T
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 May; 18(18):2219-24. PubMed ID: 22611315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic hemostasis of a bleeding marginal ulcer: hemoclipping or dual therapy with epinephrine injection and heater probe thermocoagulation.
    Lee YC; Wang HP; Yang CS; Yang TH; Chen JH; Lin CC; Tsai CY; Chang LY; Huang SP; Wu MS; Lin JT
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2002 Nov; 17(11):1220-5. PubMed ID: 12453283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adrenaline injection plus argon plasma coagulation versus adrenaline injection plus hemoclips for treating high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Taghavi SA; Soleimani SM; Hosseini-Asl SM; Eshraghian A; Eghbali H; Dehghani SM; Ahmadpour B; Saberifiroozi M
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2009 Oct; 23(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 19826646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.