329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20034003)
1. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new formula for optimized weight estimation in extreme fetal macrosomia (≥ 4500 g).
Faschingbauer F; Beckmann MW; Goecke TW; Yazdi B; Siemer J; Schmid M; Mayr A; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 22723038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].
Murlewska J; Pietryga M; Wender-Ozegowska E
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21574483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new formula for calculating weight in the fetus of < or = 1600 g.
Schild RL; Fell K; Fimmers R; Gembruch U; Hansmann M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 24(7):775-80. PubMed ID: 15476297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.
Rosati P; Arduini M; Giri C; Guariglia L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):675-80. PubMed ID: 19895358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound imaging in the small fetus.
Schild RL; Maringa M; Siemer J; Meurer B; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schmid M; Hothorn T; Hansmann ME
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 18663765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
Scioscia M; Scioscia F; Vimercati A; Caradonna F; Nardelli C; Pinto LR; Selvaggi LE
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study.
Kehl S; Schmidt U; Spaich S; Schild RL; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 21898638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound.
Schild RL; Fimmers R; Hansmann M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 16(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 11169329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort.
Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Dias T; Cooper D; Thilaganathan B;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 44(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 24311473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
