These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20034608)

  • 1. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motorcyclist rear brake simple perception-response times in rear-end collision situations.
    Davoodi SR; Hamid H; Arintono S; Muniandy R; Faezi SF
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Apr; 12(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 21469025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
    Muhrer E; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task.
    Bueno M; Fabrigoule C; Deleurence P; Ndiaye D; Fort A
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():69-79. PubMed ID: 22765914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation into the effect of an intersection crash warning system on driving performance in a simulator.
    Chen H; Cao L; Logan DB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 21972864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking.
    Van Winsum W; Heino A
    Ergonomics; 1996 Apr; 39(4):579-92. PubMed ID: 8854979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments.
    Kiefer RJ; LeBlanc DJ; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 15667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Video-based road commentary training improves hazard perception of young drivers in a dual task.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ; Williamson AR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 May; 41(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 19393791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.
    Hancock PA; de Ridder SN
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct; 46(12):1111-35. PubMed ID: 12933076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capturing attention to brake lamps.
    McIntyre SE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 18329422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. I want to brake free: The effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance.
    Payre W; Diels C
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102932. PubMed ID: 31445460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions.
    DeLucia PR; Tharanathan A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):334-50. PubMed ID: 20025419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():59-65. PubMed ID: 27586104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.