677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20035887)
1. Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter?
Zalesky A; Fornito A; Harding IH; Cocchi L; Yücel M; Pantelis C; Bullmore ET
Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(3):970-83. PubMed ID: 20035887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-retest reproducibility of white matter parcellation using diffusion MRI tractography fiber clustering.
Zhang F; Wu Y; Norton I; Rathi Y; Golby AJ; O'Donnell LJ
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Jul; 40(10):3041-3057. PubMed ID: 30875144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disrupted axonal fiber connectivity in schizophrenia.
Zalesky A; Fornito A; Seal ML; Cocchi L; Westin CF; Bullmore ET; Egan GF; Pantelis C
Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Jan; 69(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 21035793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Multishell Diffusion MRI Acquisition Strategy and Parcellation Scale on Rich-Club Organization of Human Brain Structural Networks.
Khalilian M; Kazemi K; Fouladivanda M; Makki M; Helfroush MS; Aarabi A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34072192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conserved and variable architecture of human white matter connectivity.
Bassett DS; Brown JA; Deshpande V; Carlson JM; Grafton ST
Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):1262-79. PubMed ID: 20850551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An anatomically curated fiber clustering white matter atlas for consistent white matter tract parcellation across the lifespan.
Zhang F; Wu Y; Norton I; Rigolo L; Rathi Y; Makris N; O'Donnell LJ
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():429-447. PubMed ID: 29920375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Convergence and divergence across construction methods for human brain white matter networks: an assessment based on individual differences.
Zhong S; He Y; Gong G
Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 May; 36(5):1995-2013. PubMed ID: 25641208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disrupted topological organization of structural networks revealed by probabilistic diffusion tractography in Tourette syndrome children.
Wen H; Liu Y; Rekik I; Wang S; Zhang J; Zhang Y; Peng Y; He H
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Aug; 38(8):3988-4008. PubMed ID: 28474385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Connectomes from streamlines tractography: Assigning streamlines to brain parcellations is not trivial but highly consequential.
Yeh CH; Smith RE; Dhollander T; Calamante F; Connelly A
Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():160-171. PubMed ID: 31082471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The trade-off between wiring cost and network topology in white matter structural networks in health and migraine.
Liu J; Zhao L; Nan J; Li G; Xiong S; von Deneen KM; Gong Q; Liang F; Qin W; Tian J
Exp Neurol; 2013 Oct; 248():196-204. PubMed ID: 23648629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fiber estimation and tractography in diffusion MRI: development of simulated brain images and comparison of multi-fiber analysis methods at clinical b-values.
Wilkins B; Lee N; Gajawelli N; Law M; Leporé N
Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 109():341-56. PubMed ID: 25555998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abnormal topological organization in white matter structural networks revealed by diffusion tensor tractography in unmedicated patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Zhong Z; Zhao T; Luo J; Guo Z; Guo M; Li P; Sun J; He Y; Li Z
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 51():39-50. PubMed ID: 24440373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A hierarchical method for whole-brain connectivity-based parcellation.
Moreno-Dominguez D; Anwander A; Knösche TR
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Oct; 35(10):5000-25. PubMed ID: 24740833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical analysis of minimum cost path based structural brain connectivity.
de Boer R; Schaap M; van der Lijn F; Vrooman HA; de Groot M; van der Lugt A; Ikram MA; Vernooij MW; Breteler MM; Niessen WJ
Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 21147237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep fiber clustering: Anatomically informed fiber clustering with self-supervised deep learning for fast and effective tractography parcellation.
Chen Y; Zhang C; Xue T; Song Y; Makris N; Rathi Y; Cai W; Zhang F; O'Donnell LJ
Neuroimage; 2023 Jun; 273():120086. PubMed ID: 37019346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of construction methodology on structural brain network measures: A review.
Qi S; Meesters S; Nicolay K; Romeny BM; Ossenblok P
J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Sep; 253():170-82. PubMed ID: 26129743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing Connectivity-Driven Brain Parcellation Using Ensemble Clustering.
Kurmukov A; Mussabaeva A; Denisova Y; Moyer D; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM; Gutman BA
Brain Connect; 2020 May; 10(4):183-194. PubMed ID: 32264696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification.
Shen X; Tokoglu F; Papademetris X; Constable RT
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():403-15. PubMed ID: 23747961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A hybrid approach to automatic clustering of white matter fibers.
Li H; Xue Z; Guo L; Liu T; Hunter J; Wong ST
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1249-58. PubMed ID: 19683061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How do parcellation size and short-range connectivity affect dynamics in large-scale brain network models?
Proix T; Spiegler A; Schirner M; Rothmeier S; Ritter P; Jirsa VK
Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():135-149. PubMed ID: 27480624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
