288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20036043)
1. Reproducibility of 3 different tracing methods based on cone beam computed tomography in determining the anatomical position of the mandibular canal.
Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ; Mulder J; Rangel FA; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):811-7. PubMed ID: 20036043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between the position of the mental foramen and the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve as determined by cone beam computed tomography combined with mimics.
Chen Z; Chen D; Tang L; Wang F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 25299797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance.
von Arx T; Hänni A; Sendi P; Buser D; Bornstein MM
J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1630-5. PubMed ID: 22099895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking of the inferior alveolar nerve: its implication in surgical planning.
Agbaje JO; de Casteele EV; Salem AS; Anumendem D; Lambrichts I; Politis C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2213-2220. PubMed ID: 27878463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of assessing the mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Gerlach NL; Ghaeminia H; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 24480773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography.
Naitoh M; Hiraiwa Y; Aimiya H; Ariji E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 19344041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures.
Naitoh M; Nakahara K; Suenaga Y; Gotoh K; Kondo S; Ariji E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e25-31. PubMed ID: 20123365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography.
Makris N; Stamatakis H; Syriopoulos K; Tsiklakis K; van der Stelt PF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 20412092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using cone beam computed tomography to determine safe regions for implant placement.
Sokhn S; Nasseh I; Noujeim M
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e72-7. PubMed ID: 21903512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Position of the mental foramen on panoramic radiographs and its relation to the horizontal course of the mandibular canal: a computed tomographic analysis.
Pyun JH; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Ahn SJ; Kim J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):890-5. PubMed ID: 22220715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography.
Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Borstlap WA; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):793-7. PubMed ID: 22469137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the relationship between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal by different algorithms of cone-beam computed tomography.
Mehdizadeh M; Ahmadi N; Jamshidi M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 25825100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars.
Friedland B; Donoff B; Dodson TB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1678-85. PubMed ID: 18634957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Alveolar nerve unfolding technique for synoptic analysis: visualization and quantification of inferior alveolar nerve tracings in three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Sun Y; De Munter S; Sijbers J; Politis C
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):e374-7. PubMed ID: 23851874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
