These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2003705)

  • 21. Management of the poorly prepared colonoscopy patient: colonoscopic colon enemas as a preparation for colonoscopy.
    Sohn N; Weinstein MA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Apr; 51(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 18188651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Bowel preparation before colonoscopy: personal experience and brief literature review].
    Geraci G; Pisello F; Modica G; Li Volsi F; Facella T; Romeo G; Maggio S; Sciumè C
    G Chir; 2007 May; 28(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 17547791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
    Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Colonoscopy: the initial test for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Chaudhry V; Hyser MJ; Gracias VH; Gau FC
    Am Surg; 1998 Aug; 64(8):723-8. PubMed ID: 9697900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Safe and effective abdominal pressure during colonoscopy: forearm versus open hand technique.
    Prechel JA; Hucke R
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2009; 32(1):27-30; quiz 31-2. PubMed ID: 19197187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.
    Rex DK; Goodwine BW
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 May; 97(5):1148-51. PubMed ID: 12014719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
    Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.
    Al-Shurieki SH; Marshall JB
    Dig Liver Dis; 2005 Sep; 37(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 15916930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section.
    Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jul; 98(7):1504-7. PubMed ID: 12873570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Cath-Cam: a new concept in colonoscopy.
    Long G; Fritscher-Ravens A; Mosse CA; Mills T; Swain P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6):997-1001. PubMed ID: 17140912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap.
    Lee YT; Hui AJ; Wong VW; Hung LC; Sung JJ
    Endoscopy; 2006 Jul; 38(7):739-42. PubMed ID: 16673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy.
    Leaper M; Johnston MJ; Barclay M; Dobbs BR; Frizelle FA
    Endoscopy; 2004 Jun; 36(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 15202045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tapered colonoscope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy.
    Anderson JC; Walker G; Birk JW; Alpern Z; Von Althen I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jun; 65(7):1042-7. PubMed ID: 17331512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies.
    Sanaka MR; Shah N; Mullen KD; Ferguson DR; Thomas C; McCullough AJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Dec; 101(12):2726-30. PubMed ID: 17227519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?
    Church JM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1994 Apr; 89(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 8147359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres.
    Hoff G; Bretthauer M; Huppertz-Hauss G; Kittang E; Stallemo A; Høie O; Dahler S; Nyhus S; Halvorsen FA; Pallenschat J; Vetvik K; Kristian Sandvei P; Friestad J; Pytte R; Coll P
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):481-7. PubMed ID: 16635918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.
    Radaelli F; Meucci G; Sgroi G; Minoli G;
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 18445096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency.
    Dickey W; Garrett D
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Jan; 97(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11808973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment of colonic polyps--practical considerations.
    Cohen LB; Waye JD
    Clin Gastroenterol; 1986 Apr; 15(2):359-76. PubMed ID: 3731518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure.
    Ben-Horin S; Bar-Meir S; Avidan B
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19251002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.