These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20038012)

  • 21. Assessing the effect of verbal working memory load on visuo-spatial exogenous orienting.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 413(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 17174028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Display polarity, stimulus exposure duration, and visual lobe shape.
    Chiu CH; Chan AH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Apr; 104(2):467-80. PubMed ID: 17566436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects.
    Reynolds HN
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(4):523-40. PubMed ID: 8296925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Parafoveal magnification: visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading.
    Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 19470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of foveal load and visual context on peripheral letter recognition.
    Salvemini AV; Stewart AL; Purcell DG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1996 Aug; 92(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 8782427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC; Khoe W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Naming fluency in dyslexic and nondyslexic readers: differential effects of visual crowding in foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral vision.
    Moll K; Jones M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2085-91. PubMed ID: 24161215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness.
    Proksch J; Bavelier D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jul; 14(5):687-701. PubMed ID: 12167254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional blink reflex modulation in a continuous performance task is modality specific.
    Lipp OV; Neumann DL
    Psychophysiology; 2004 May; 41(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 15102127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peripheral target recognition and visual field narrowing in aviators and nonaviators.
    Williams LJ
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(2):215-32. PubMed ID: 11540258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When less is more: evidence for a facilitative cathodal tDCS effect in attentional abilities.
    Weiss M; Lavidor M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 24(9):1826-33. PubMed ID: 22624605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrophysiological correlates of target eccentricity in texture segmentation.
    Schaffer S; Schubö A; Meinecke C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Jun; 80(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 21419177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the benefits of transient attention across the visual field.
    Kristjánsson A; Sigurdardottir HM
    Perception; 2008; 37(5):747-64. PubMed ID: 18605148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attention shift not memory averaging reduces foveal bias.
    Uddin MK; Kawabe T; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3301-6. PubMed ID: 16256825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The amplitude of N2pc reflects the physical disparity between target item and distracters.
    Zhao G; Liu Q; Zhang Y; Jiao J; Zhang Q; Sun H; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 491(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21215298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.