These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2003891)

  • 21. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of composite resin placement and use of an unfilled resin on the microleakage of two dentin bonding agents.
    Saunders WP; Strang R; Ahmad I
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 2076240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
    Wibowo G; Stockton L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts.
    Krejci I; Duc O; Dietschi D; de Campos E
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 12670067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations.
    LoPresti JT; David S; Calamia JR
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 9002814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth.
    Castro A; Feigal RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth.
    Dietschi D; Maeder M; Meyer JM; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):823-31. PubMed ID: 2082415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of ferrule and bonding on the compressive fracture resistance of post and core restorations.
    Dorriz H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Hooshmand T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19142250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture resistance and microtensile bond strength of maxillary premolars restored with two resin composite inlay systems.
    Sun YS; Chen YM; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 18578176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.