These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20039378)

  • 21. Estimating the odds ratios of Crohn disease for the main CARD15/NOD2 mutations using a conditional maximum likelihood method in pedigrees collected via affected family members.
    Pascoe L; Zouali H; Sahbatou M; Hugot JP
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Aug; 15(8):864-71. PubMed ID: 17457368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Segregation analysis of prostate cancer in France: evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance and residual brother-brother dependence.
    Valeri A; Briollais L; Azzouzi R; Fournier G; Mangin P; Berthon P; Cussenot O; Demenais F
    Ann Hum Genet; 2003 Mar; 67(Pt 2):125-37. PubMed ID: 12675688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Model-Free Linkage Analysis of a Binary Trait.
    Xu W; Ma J; Greenwood CMT; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():343-373. PubMed ID: 28980254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simulation of pedigree genotypes by random walks.
    Lange K; Matthysse S
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Dec; 45(6):959-70. PubMed ID: 2589323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gene expression in large pedigrees: analytic approaches.
    Cantor RM; Cordell HJ
    BMC Genet; 2016 Feb; 17 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):3. PubMed ID: 26866765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sampling correction in linkage analysis.
    Ginsburg E; Malkin I; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15305325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The sumLINK statistic for genetic linkage analysis in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Christensen GB; Knight S; Camp NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):628-36. PubMed ID: 19217022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating the power of variance component linkage analysis in large pedigrees.
    Chen WM; Abecasis GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):471-84. PubMed ID: 16685720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A statistical framework to guide sequencing choices in pedigrees.
    Cheung CY; Marchani Blue E; Wijsman EM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2014 Feb; 94(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 24507777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Quantitative-MFG Test: A Linear Mixed Effect Model to Detect Maternal-Offspring Gene Interactions.
    Clark MM; Blangero J; Dyer TD; Sobel EM; Sinsheimer JS
    Ann Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 80(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 26567478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fine-mapping and family-based association analyses of prostate cancer risk variants at Xp11.
    Lu L; Sun J; Isaacs SD; Wiley KE; Smith S; Pruett K; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Wiklund F; Grönberg H; Walsh PC; Chang BL; Zheng SL; Isaacs WB; Xu J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jul; 18(7):2132-6. PubMed ID: 19549809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of population admixture on traditional linkage analysis.
    Barnholtz-Sloan JS; de Andrade M; Chakraborty R
    Ethn Dis; 2001; 11(3):519-31. PubMed ID: 11572417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genome-wide linkage scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes in men with aggressive disease: significant evidence for linkage at chromosome 15q12.
    Lange EM; Ho LA; Beebe-Dimmer JL; Wang Y; Gillanders EM; Trent JM; Lange LA; Wood DP; Cooney KA
    Hum Genet; 2006 May; 119(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 16508751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. SNP-based linkage analysis in extended pedigrees: comparison between two alternative approaches.
    Saint-Pierre A; D'Elia Y; Ciullo M; Pramstaller PP; Pattaro C
    Hum Hered; 2014; 78(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 24969533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genome-wide linkage analysis for aggressive prostate cancer in Utah high-risk pedigrees.
    Christensen GB; Camp NJ; Farnham JM; Cannon-Albright LA
    Prostate; 2007 May; 67(6):605-13. PubMed ID: 17299800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Case-control single-marker and haplotypic association analysis of pedigree data.
    Browning SR; Briley JD; Briley LP; Chandra G; Charnecki JH; Ehm MG; Johansson KA; Jones BJ; Karter AJ; Yarnall DP; Wagner MJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 28(2):110-22. PubMed ID: 15578751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sequence-based linkage analysis.
    Furman I; Rieder MJ; Da Ponte S; Carrington DP; Nickerson DA; Kruglyak L; Markianos K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):647-53. PubMed ID: 15329798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian pedigree inference with small numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms via a factor-graph representation.
    Anderson EC; Ng TC
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():39-51. PubMed ID: 26450523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.